I don't know the options, but I can give a definition, maybe this will help:
an initiative is generally the first step taken towards an action, or the will to follow that action.
In legal terms an initiative is the power to introduce a new legislative measure (law or policy).
Disadvantages come from using positive peer culture techniques are related to non permanence of measures.
Explanation:
The reason that people fall to peer pressure and do terrible things is not peer pressure itself but because they are gullible.
This understanding is very central if one is out to get why positive peer pressure is extremely easy to fall back from.
Most of the times, the people who are in positive peer pressure begin to show good progress but as soon as they are back with their old influence they are falling back into their old habits.
To curb this, the need is to help people be self reliant and not rely on peers at all.
Answer:
Explanation:
In the scenario being described, the Product Owner's best course of action would be to stop the current iteration and plan a new iteration with new knowledge. This is because they have already told her that the 5 of the stories will not be completed, therefore there is no reason to maintain focus on that, instead planning on new iterations and how they will be completed would be the most efficient course of action.
Answer: Congress had no power to tax
Explanation:
Hjjk
<span>Door-in-the-face
There are two relatively effective techniques to get someone to perform a favor for another. They are door-in-the-face (DITF) and foot-in-the-door techniques. Both techniques significantly increase the chance of a second request being performed. The door-in-the-face technique involves asking for a large favor that's highly likely to be declined. Then afterwards asking for a much smaller favor. In a classic DITF study, some researches took a randomly selected group of people and divided them into 3 groups. For the 1st group, the researchers first asked for volunteers to provide counseling to juvenile delinquents for 2 hours per week, for 2 years. Then after that request was declined, asked for volunteers to chaperone some juvenile delinquents for a day trip to the zoo. The 2nd group was simply asked to perform the day trip, and finally the 3rd group had counseling described to them, and was then asked to provide the chaperoning to the zoo. For the 1st group, 50% agreed to perform the day trip to the zoo, whereas only 17% of the 2nd group agreed to the trip and 25% of the 3rd group agreed.</span>
