In simple definition followership means:
1. the ability or willingness to follow a leader.
2. a group of followers or supporters; following.
Followership is the actions of someone in a subordinate role. It can also be considered as a specific set of skills that complement leadership, a role within a hierarchical organization, a social construct that is integral to the leadership process, or the behaviors engaged in while interacting with leaders in an effort to meet organizational objectives.[1] As such, followership is best defined as an intentional practice on the part of the subordinate to enhance the synergetic interchange between the follower and the leader.
In organizations, “leadership is not just done by the leader, and followership is not just done by followers.” [2] This perspective suggests that leadership and followership do not operate on one continuum, with one decreasing while the other increases. Rather, each dimension exists as a discrete dimension, albeit with some shared competencies.[3]
The study of followership is an emerging area within the leadership field that helps explain outcomes. Specifically, followers play important individual, relational, and collective roles in organizational failures and successes.[4][5][6] “If leaders are to be credited with setting the vision for the department or organization and inspiring followers to action, then followers need to be credited with the work that is required to make the vision a reality.”[7]
The term follower can be used as a personality type, as a position in a hierarchy, as a role, or as a set of traits and behaviors. Studies of followership have produced various theories including trait, behavioral attributes, role, and constructionist theories in addition to exploring myths or misunderstandings about followership.
Winter pemmican, berry pemmican and dried buffalo meat are some of the food products made from buffalo that fed the Native Americans through the winter.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
Native Americans were mostly into agricultural activities. Through out the winters, they would feed on the supply they had grown and stored. Irrespective of their agricultural activities, they were heavy meat-eaters. They ate meat of deer, buffalo, elk, turkeys and other kinds of birds, some sea food which would also include whales at times.
Buffaloes were one of the most important resource for the Native Americans. The animal was a source for food, clothing, weapons and tools. As for the food supply in winters, the people stored and preserved various body parts of the buffalo in parfleches, also known as hide containers.
Answer:
I got you
Just Kidding do your own work
Explanation:
Answer:
reversibility
Explanation:
For Piaget, the cognitive development of the human being begins from the moment of his birth and becomes more efficient and comprehensive as this individual ages and his brain is trained more intensively. For Paiget, this development occurs at stages that are related to the age of the individuals.
Within this theory, Piaget, developed the concept of cognitive reversibility, which is the stage in which a child manages to develop logical thinking, where he is aware of size, quantity, movements and any other situation that is logical.
As we can see in the question above, the youngest nephew has difficulty understanding that if no material is removed from the ball, it will have no less material, even if it is rolled on a long surface. This is a logical concept that the child has a hard time understanding because his cognitive knowledge is still weak in reversibility.
Hello! Your answer is B) diminishing the influence of soft money in campaigns.
