Answer:
b. The bond puttable in 10 years will depreciate more than the bond puttable in 5 years
Explanation:
Data provided in the question
20 -year corporate bond i.e issued at par at 10%
One issue is for 5 years
other issue is for 10 years
Now if the interest rate rise by 200 basis points
So,
Based on the above information
If a bond is issued at a future date, any price drop due to higher interest rates will be eliminated as the holder is able to return the bond to the issuer earlier
Hence, the option B is correct
If the marginal benefit is greater than the marginal cost
The marginal benefit is the amount of satisfaction that you receive when you consume an additional goods or service, meanwhile the marginal cost is the amount of sacrifice that you need to do in order to get that additional good or service.
to put it simply, You better off consuming that additional product if the satisfaction that you get is worth the sacrifice that you make
She is permitted, according to the applicable tax legislation, to donate $30 000.
This is further explained below.
<h3>How much can Sue's mother give under current tax laws?</h3>
In most cases, Sue's mother is able to pay Ken the first fifteen thousand dollars and then proceed to give Sue the remaining fifteen thousand dollars. Because Sue's mother gave this to her, there will be no tax placed on it because it is considered a gift.
The act or process of passing tax laws, as well as the body of laws that allow for the levying of taxes and the administration of taxes, are together referred to as tax legislation.
Any object or document that is verifiable and that is frequently accepted as payment for goods and services as well as the repayment of obligations, such as taxes, in a given nation or socio-economic setting is considered to be money in that nation.
In conclusion, Sue's mother and father could give Ken and Sue a gift of $15,000 each, bringing the total amount of money they give to each of them to a grand total of $60,000 each.
Read more about tax laws
brainly.com/question/802511
#SPJ1
Answer:
it might be B but I'm not sure
Answer:
Of course Jo-Anne Roberts can keep the apartment.
Explanation:
Jo-Anne and the previous owner of the apartment had a valid contract by which Jo-Anne was to pay $3.7 million for the apartment. She has already partially completed her performance on the contract, so the seller must perform his part of the contract.
