The best answer that completes the statement above is this: CHANGING CRITERION DESIGN.
This question is based on the use of a double-blind study. When we say double-blind study, from the term itself double-blind, it means that neither the experimenters nor the sample or participants are going to receive the treatment of the said experiment. This kind of study is typically used in order to remove bias in the research results. Hope this helps.
Closest to the view of the majority of voters.
The Anthony Downs model attempts to apply economic theories to political decision making.
Answer and Explanation:
The Journal entry is shown below:-
a. Bad Debt Expense Dr, $36,800 ($40,000 – $3,200)
To Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $36,800
(Being the bad debt expense is recorded)
For recording this we debited the bad debt expense as it increased the expenses and at the same time it reduced the assets so the allowance for doubtful accounts is credited
b. Bad Debt Expense Dr, $40,730 ($40,000 + $730)
To Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $40,730
For recording this we debited the bad debt expense as it increased the expenses and at the same time it reduced the assets so the allowance for doubtful accounts is credited
e. a, b, and c? All of these are true
Answer:
$169.07
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Loan amount = $29,000
Time = 10 years
Interest rate = 7% compounded monthly
Therefore,
Interest rate per period, r = 7% ÷ 12 = 0.583% = 0.00583
number of periods, n = 10 × 12 = 120 months
Now,
Loan amount = Monthly payments × [ { 1 - (1 + r )⁻ⁿ } ÷ r]
on substituting the respective values, we get
$29,000 = Monthly payments × [ { 1 - (1 + 0.00583 )⁻¹²⁰ } ÷ 0.00583]
or
$29,000 = Monthly payments × 171.53
or
Monthly payments = $169.07
