Answer:
"Opponents of the War Powers Resolution have traditionally claimed that clause 11 confers upon Congress only a narrow piece of war power. Defenders of the Resolution have argued in contrast that the Resolution constitutes an exercise of congressional authority under the clause. This last contention pokes at the truth without quite striking it. The War Powers Resolution is not constitutional as an exercise of the war power. It is constitutional because it defines the war power. The War Powers Resolution is nothing more or less than a congressional definition of the word "war" in article I. A definition of this kind coupled with a reasonable enforcement mechanism is well within the power of Congress under a proper understanding of the constitutional system of checks and balances. The definition does not intrude on any presidential prerogative. The mechanisms chosen by Congress to enforce the provisions of the Resolution were reasonable in 1973 and, although matters have been complicated by the United States Supreme Court's decision late last Term in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, those mechanisms remain reasonable today."
Explanation:
Answer:
No
Explanation:
No, the UPS employer is not acting legally by firing Kenneth. As long as an employer is able to fulfill all of the requirements of the job then they are protected and cannot legally be fired without proper reason for termination. If the employee gets injured on the job they are eligible for filling a workers' compensation claim. If an employer fires an employee for any on the job related injury then they are doing so illegally and can be sued by the employee for doing so.
Answer: I don't think I am seeing the full question but based on what I do see, I am assuming that the defendant's attorney could appeal the outcome, and if successful the case would be retried in a court of appeals.
Explanation: See above
The state in which a defendant has been sentenced by a court after having either pleaded guilty or been found guilty by a judge or jury. Being adjudicated is equivalent to a conviction.
To compute a crime rate, divide the estimated number of offences or crimes in the particular jurisdiction by the total population.
- The crime rate can also be computed per 100,000, for example. Therefore, the total population is first divided by 100,000. The resulting quotient is then used as the divisor with the number of crime incidents.
- Another way of computing the crime rate is per 1,000 or per 10,000. The same method, as above, is used.
- The crime rate of one jurisdiction can also be compared with the crime rate of another jurisdiction, especially if they share the comparative population figures.
Thus, generally, the crime rate is computed by dividing the number of the reported criminal offences committed in a jurisdiction (for example, a town) by the total population of that jurisdiction.
Learn more about the factors that determine a jurisdiction's crime rate at brainly.com/question/13772436
