Answer:
Foreign subsidiary; taking title.
Explanation:
A <em>foreign subsidiary</em> links buyers and sellers in different countries but it has no manufacturing capability. Its most important function is<em> taking title</em> to products and moving them from the domestic country to a foreign country. A foreign subsidiary is part of a larger corporation that has its headquarters in the country of origin. It takes title of the products, that is to say, it owns the products and controls its sale.
Answer:
The best answer to the question: The ease with which attitudes can be changed depends on a number of factors, including:___, D: All of these.
Explanation:
An attitude is defined as a response a person has, or a behavior a person assumes, towards a situation, an event, or a person or object. Because attitudes are so individualized, they depend on a series of factors that are tightly tied to the individual, his personality, his genetics and his upbringing. In this case, in order to change a person´s attitude, then, the following factors need to be kept in mind: the message source, meaning where the message comes from, the characteristics of the message, because it will affect how the person perceives the message, and the characteristics of the target, because these will play a definitive role on how the message is interpreted. This is why the answer is D.
Answer: , the Second Amendment applied to the states. Here, the Court remanded the case to the Seventh Circuit to determine whether Chicago's handgun ban violated an individual's right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.
Explanation: Mark me as Brainliest
Answer:
The correct answer here is A: the fact that the broadcast speech was only available to a limited audience.
Explanation:
When talking about freedom of speech vs. public interest, what judges need to evaluate, when making a ruling about a situation such as this, is how much the public is being affected and to what extent, as in number of people actually being negatively affected, in order to overcome freedom of speech. Freedom of speech, is a right covered by the Constitution, and its protection sometimes supersedes other rights. However, when the affectation is too broad, or can cause damage to other protected rights, depending on how the consequences affect people, and the number of people being affected, then a judge may see fit to curtail, or limit, the freedom of speech. In this case, because it was a limited broadcast, and there is the principle that these viewers could simply decide not to watch, or simply stop paying their subscription, then freedom of speech takes precedence since the damage is limited by numbers.