As per my explanation to (b) above, the largest number of primes that could factor such a number is 4.
Note that 2,3,5 and 7 are the smallest primes, then use the reasoning from
(b) above. we are looking for four exponents, that, when 1 is added to each and all are multiplied together, would equal 20.
But no such integers k, l, m, and n exist such that (k + 1)(l + 1)(m + 1) (n + 1) = 20 where k, l,m, and n ≥ 1 so this number, whatever it is, can't have 4 prime factors
Let's drop 7 out of the mix and suppose it has just 3 prime factors 2, 3, and 5 again we are looking for three exponents, that, when 1 is added to each and all are multiplied together, would equal 20. Put another way, we are looking for k, l and m ≥ 1 such that (k + 1)(l + 1)(m + 1) = 20
Note that the only possibility here is when we have 2 *2 *5 = 20 and the smallest possible product would be 2^(4 )* 3^(1) * 5^(1) = 2^4 * 3 * 5 = 240
Now......the only remaining possibility is that this number is composed of the two smallest primes, 2 and 3, and we are looking for some k and l ≥ 1 such that (k + 1)(l + 1) = 20 clearly, the only possibilities are when k = 4 and l = 5, or vice-versa
So this number would factor as either 2^3 * 3^4 = 648 or 2^4 * 3^3 = 432 and both are > 240.
Learn more about positive integers at
brainly.com/question/1367050
#SPJ4
