Answer:
Yes, Sarah is liable for the $5,000 bill since she ordered the supplies and signed the contract using her own name.
She is responsible for the money owed to the medical supply facility, but if this purchase practice was common and happened before, she can also demand that the former partners pay her back.
That's a 'cartel'. It's illegal in the US. It's also, mean, nasty, and not fair.
Answer:
a framing bias.
Explanation:
given data
necklace he liked = $139
pearl necklace originally = $173.75
sale for = 20% off
reduced the price = $139
solution
- Rodrigo is subject to readymade bias. This bias refers to how people’s decisions affect situations, words, or settings. Although both stores have the same price, Pearl’s own stores create a relative factor
- It showed a high base price and a 20% discount, which made Rodrigo feel like he was making a deal, so he was more inclined to buy the necklace and not at the Murphy jewelry store.
Answer:
company's product line in the dog food market
Explanation:
In the description provided, it can be said that Prime Cuts will be an addition to the company's product line in the dog food market. A product line is a group of related products all marketed under a single brand name and are sold by the same company to the same targeted group of consumers. Such as in this scenario, all of the products listed are dog treats/food with different ingredients and are all sold by the same company to people looking for dog food.
