Answer:
12.09%.
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the rate of return on the fund
First step is to calculate the beginning year NAV
Beginning year NAV = ($400 million assets - 50 million debt) / 15 million shares
Beginning year NAV = 23.33
Second step is to calculate the ending year NAV
Ending year NAV = ($500 million assets - (500*0.75% expense) - 40 million debt] / 18 million shares
Ending year NAV =[456.25/18 million shares]
Ending year NAV =25.35
Now let calculate the return using this formula
Return = (Ending NAV -beginning NAV + Capital gain + income) / Beginning NAV)
Let plug in the formula
Return = (25.35-23.33+0.30+0.50)/23.33
Return = 12.09%
Therefore the rate of return on the fund is 12.09%
Answer:
Stock-split
Explanation:
A stock-split means that the existing price of one share of Nathan will be divided into two such that the two new shares will be exactly equal to one old share. Once that is done, small investors will be more comfortable buying the shares at a cheaper price.
Whether before or after the stock-split. A given amount invested will give an investor the same percentage ownership in the same company. It has only made Nathan's shares look cheaper to attract small investors while the market capitalization (overall value) of Nathan remains the same.
Explanation:
I would leave out the part about the people you currently work with and just state that you are a team player and the you love to be around people who are outgoing and you are very sociable and a quick learner
Answer:
Spending variance $100 unfavorable
Explanation:
The spending variance is the difference between the standard cost allowed for the actual activity and the actual cost of the activity
$
Standard cost allowed for the actual activity
=7,850 + (402×203) + (952×112)= 196,080
Actual cost <u>196,180</u>
Spending variance <u> 100</u> unfavorable
Answer:
The order of questions most objetive and unbiased is first (a) and then (b)
Explanation:
The order of the questions influences the answer of the people. If you ask first about dating, when they answer the question about happiness, the second answer would focus on the happiness it brings if they are datting. That means that I am inducing an answer about the happines of being dating or not, that is not ethical and the survey is not objetive. If the order of the questions is first (a) and the (b), the answer about happiness is not focused in the sentimental situation, and you can find if there is a correlation betwen the happiness and dating.
