The answer for the blank part of the statement is employment-at-will. Employment-at-will is defined as <u>a U.S type of contractual agreement where both employee and employer agree that the employee can be dismissed by the employer for any reason which is not illegal by law. </u>
This type of contract is common in the late 19th century, but by the 20th century, most states add protections for the employees under any employment contract due to the power imbalance that occur in these kinds of contracts.
Answer:
The errors are:
1. When the author is quoted in a sentence, his name is not in brackets, only the year of his book. For example, the write-up should have read like this: "Shindell (2008) argues that hackers increasingly integrate ..." This is a more appropriate way of citing an author. However, the writer could do well to show the exact words of Shindell with quotation marks to differentiate from his or her words.
2. Two sentences were put in quotation marks without any indication of the author(s) to which the words were attributed. Since they look like direct quotes from Shindell, the write-up should read like this: Shindell (2008) said, "during an attack, victims ..." And the second quoted sentence should read like this: "... were hit with ransomware in the previous 12 months," according to Shindell (2008).
Explanation:
Referencing somebody else's intellectual property helps to avoid plagiarism, which is considered as a very serious crime.
Answer:
What were wealthy merchants known as in India?What were wealthy merchants known as in India?
What were wealthy merchants known as in India?
Explanation:
What were wealthy merchants known as in India?I miss you so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so much
Answer:
One of the elements necessary to recover damages if there has been a material misstatement in a registration statement filed pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 is that:
there was a material false or misleading statement in the financial statements.
Explanation:
A registration statement includes prospectus and other sets of documents, which a company files with the U.S. SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) during a public offering of its securities. Section 11 of the Securities Act specifically provides that an accountant may be held liable to any purchaser of a security who relies on some materially misstated financial statements included in the registration statement.