Incomplete question. The options:
A. Black Southerners were not acting subordinate to whites.
B. Too many black Southerners were graduating from high school.
C. Black women were refusing the advances of white men.
D. Black men were running for local political office.
Answer:
<u>A. Black Southerners were not acting subordinate to whites.</u>
Explanation:
Sadly, because of the ingrained racial discrimination at the time, "Whites" felt that "Blacks" were subordinates. In other words, they ("the Whites") wanted to exercise headship over the "Blacks".
This wrong reasoning was highlighted in B. Wells's own words,
<em>"The Negroes are getting too independent," they say "we must teach them a lesson."</em>
<em>What lesson? The lesson of subordination. "Kill the leaders and it will cow the Negro who dares to shoot a white man, even in self-defense."</em>
he didn`t think they had the right to protest
Following the revolts by the colonists and the various assemblies that were conducted whereby some of the delegates called for a war due to increasing dissatisfaction with the British, there was agitation for independence, a prospect that King George III perceived as unnecessary as they did not have the right to protest
Both sophists and philosophers were well trained and highly educated, but the main difference was that a sophist taught others and they got paid for that. It is said that their own wealth was their only goal.
Philosophers, such as Socrates, refused to get paid.
Throughout history, the sophists have had a reputation as professionally amoral, . They would help people to attain any goal, regardless of what it was. They would take any case, promote any cause, and empower any person, if the money was right.
Philosophers, for the most part, have walked on the side of the angels. They may sometimes have had reputations as prolix and obscure, complex and abstract, out of touch, but they have, for the most part, seemed to be purer souls in their focus and work.
In other words, the sophists were much more concerned about how than about why. The philosophers have always been more cautious.
