The correct answer: William
Lloyd Garrison
The most unmistakable and questionable change development of the period was abolitionism, the counter slave development. Despite the fact that abolitionism had pulled in numerous supporters in the progressive time frame, the development slacked amid the mid 1800s. By the 1830s, the soul of abolitionism surged, particularly in the Northeast. In 1831, William Lloyd Garrison propelled an abolitionist daily paper, The Liberator, acquiring himself a notoriety for being the most radical white abolitionist. Though past abolitionists had proposed blacks be dispatched back to Africa, Garrison worked in conjunction with noticeable dark abolitionists, including Fredrick Douglass, to request level with social liberties for blacks. Battalion's call to war was "prompt liberation," yet he perceived that it would take a long time to persuade enough Americans to restrict bondage. To spread the abrogation enthusiasm, he established the New England Anti-Slavery Society in 1832 and the American Anti-Slavery Society in 1833. By 1840, these associations had brought forth more than 1,500 nearby sections. All things considered, abolitionists were a little minority in the United States in the 1840s, regularly subjected to scoffing and physical brutality.
I believe it was by giving support to the European countries economically and politically.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The issues in France in the 1780s that would have been addressed if the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen were enforced would have been the following. First of all, the poverty of the French people who were living in harsh economic conditions. Then, the oppression exerted by the King of France, followed by the injustices suffered by many French who had no rights and voice to express their opinions. If they opposed the King, they were sent to prison with no trail.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen was issued on August 26, 1789, by the French National Constituent Assembly, manifesting that all men had natural and universal rights.
The Korean war had a purpose but it had largely failed.
Explanation:
Truman can and cannot be blamed for the war as he had formulated this policy of attacking in per preemptive measures to control the spread of communism that had plagued the US for so long.
At the same time the nature of the policy was such that it has led to the development of the US in certain senses.
So, as all things in history it is a two way thing and often based around the perspective one has of things.
The war itself was not a success in terms of containing communism as North Korea was out of grasp.
