Answer:
The answer is given in detailed below along with headings separated for each part of the question
Explanation:
<u>External Competitiveness and Internal Alignment</u>
The comparisons with competitors with regard to the income received, some of which offer even high salaries in order to get the best individuals to work for them refer to as external competitiveness. While in the case of Internal alignment the comparison is done on the individuals job or skill level with each others and with the organisations objectives.
<u>Importance of External Competitiveness</u>
This is important depending on the goal of the organisations such that they provide attractive pay packages to retain their employees while ensuring that the labour cost is controlled so that it's products/services prices remain competitive in the market.
<u>Factors shaping the organisations external competitiveness</u>
The factors affecting the external competitiveness are as given below:
(1) Customs specific to both the organisations and its employees.
(2) Labour Market Competition
(3) The Competition in the market of product/service
These factors combined affect the level of pay an employee receives within an organisation.
Answer:
$80,000
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what the amount of variable administrative cost to allocate to Department 1 would be
Variable administrative cost to allocate to Department 1=(40,000 ÷100,000) x $200,000
Variable administrative cost to allocate to Department 1=0.4×$200,000
Variable administrative cost to allocate to Department 1= $80,000
Therefore The Variable administrative cost to allocate to Department 1 would be $80,000
Answer:
a good decision requires that we recognize both viewpoints
Explanation:
Based on this information it can be said that an economist would most likely state that a good decision requires that we recognize both viewpoints. That is because every decision will affect everyone, but some individuals will be affected positively while others will be affected negatively. Therefore trying to recognize the viewpoint of both sides will allow for decisions that are as fair as possible to both sides.
Answer:
C) ABC 5% and DEF 5.7%
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Purchasing Cost of Stock ABC purchased = $40 per share
Purchasing Cost of Stock DEF purchased = $35 per share
Time = 6 months
Selling price of share of ABC = $42 per share
Selling price of DEF share = $36
Dividend paid to the DEF = $0.5 each quarter i.e $0.5 twice in 6 months
Thus,
Total dividend paid to DEF = $0.5 × 2
= $1
Now,
For ABC
Total return = Selling price - Purchasing Cost
= $42 - $40
= $2 per share
thus,
Holding period return = [ Total return ÷ Purchasing cost ] × 100%
= [ $2 ÷ $40 ] × 100%
= 5%
For DEF
Total return = Selling price + Dividend received - Purchasing Cost
= $36 + $1 - $35
= $2 per share
thus,
Holding period return = [ Total return ÷ Purchasing cost ] × 100%
= [ $2 ÷ $35 ] × 100%
= 5.7%
Hence,
option C) ABC 5% and DEF 5.7%.
Answer:
c) Provide detailed hazard and safety information about a controlled product
Explanation:
A safety data sheet is a sheet having listed all the information which involves in chemical handling, its hazards and storage management. It has physical, environmental and health related hazards and how it can be stored and managed and used.
All other options are wrong as SDS does not assist purchasing of chemicals and does not decide workplace policy. Therefore option a and b are wrong.
