The similarity between the two Industrial Revolutions is that they both involved an increase in the degree to which machines were being used to do tasks that had once been done in other ways. Yes, there were differences in that the earlier Industrial Revolution was more about things capital goods like steam engines while the second was about consumer goods. But, in both cases, the main thing that was going on was an increase in the use of machinery. This is what they have in common and what makes it legitimate to call both of these "Industrial Revolutions."
When soldiers went away to war their jobs needed to be replaced to keep the economy stable, women were able to take this opportunity and work in factories for munitions and sewing and many other things, this was a big step in the right direction to gender equality, after WW1 people started to change their attitude and realised that women can work and can do just as good as men in some countries they were given the vote and more opportunities opened for women in different industries and they were able to make a living for themselves instead of being reliant on a husband to get money for their whole family
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
No, the repeal of Prohibition did not cause severe dust storms in the Great Plains.
What happened in the Great Plains when severe drought followed the removal of native grasses was that strong winds blew away topsoil and created a Dust Bowl.
In the 1930s, the Great Plains lived difficult moments when severe dust storms hit this region of the United States. The dryness due to lack of water, the removal of native grasses, combined with climate conditions, produced these dust storms that killed animals and ruined the crops. There was no way to keep on farming the land and people had to move to the Pacific West, to California, where they had to start a new life.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In the mid-1700s, the "American society" compared to British society in terms of the rights and freedoms ordinary people enjoyed in that American colonists aspired to have the liberty, equality, and opportunities of a free nation, without the heavy taxation imposed bu the English crow.
Yes, Americans could have land and property, but the British monarchy exerted too much pressure and taxations with acts such as the Navigation Acts, the Stamp Act, or the Tea Act, among many others. The colonists' desire for liberty grew higher because they had to pay taxes but had no representation in the British Parliament.
