Answer:
A
Explanation:Bcause ethnic identity should not determine youre personality. Many peoplefrom the same ethic identity may have different personalities.
Answer: 15000; 3750
Explanation:
From the question,
Q = 660 – 12P
MC = 5
The consumer surplus in a perfectly competitive market will be:
P = MC
Therefore, P = 5
Q = 660 - 12P = 660 - 12(5) = 660 - 60 = 600
Consumer surplus = 1/2 × (55 - 5) (600)
= 1/2 × 50 × 600
= 15,000
For monopoly, MR = MC
Total Revenue = P × Q
Since Q= 660 - 12P
P = (660 - Q)/12
TR = P × Q
= (660 - Q)/12 × Q
= (660Q- Q²)/12 × Q
MR = (660 - 2Q)/12
MR = MC
(660 - 2Q)/12 = 5
(660 - 2Q) = 5 × 12
660 - 2Q = 60
2Q = 660 - 60
2Q = 600
Q = 600/2
Q= 300
Since P =(660 - Q)/12
= (660 - 300)/12
= 360/12
= 30
Consumer surplus = 1/2 × (55 - 30) (30)
= 1/2 × 25 × 300
= 3750
Therefore, the answer is 15000; 3750
Answer:
$134,000.
Explanation:
According to the rules of GAAP, the asset's value recorded in the books is the cost at which it was acquired. The recorded value becomes the assets book value. For tangible assists such as land, motor vehicles, and buildings, the book value will comprise the actual assets' cost plus all other acquisition related costs such as agents fee and surveys fee.
For easy service repairs, the price it paid was $134,000. It accepted the counteroffer, meaning it paid that amount for the land. No other related costs are mentioned. $134,000 is the book value for the land.
Answer:
Geometric Average return = 7.83%
Explanation:
First we need to find the missing value of data using Arithmetic mean formula
Arithmetic Mean = Sum of value / No of values
8.8% = Sum of Values / 4
Sum of Values = 8.8% x 4
Sum Values = 35.2%
Using Sum of Values we minus the remaining values in order to get the missing value of the data.
35.20% - 16.3% - 10.2%-(14.1%) = 22.80%
In order to get Geometric mean value we use geometric mean formula
G.M = 4 Sqrt(16.3% x 10.2% x -14.1% + 22.80%)
Geometric Mean = 7.83%
<span>The looser interpretation of the law created a multimember executive whereas the strict interpretation created a one-person executive.
This filling in of the blanks creates an appropriate and meaningful sentence. Laws may be open to various interpretations. If "person" was thought to be a singular physical person, that would give rise to a strict interpretation for the purposes of the law and a "one-person executive". Operational definitions are important, and "person" could be interpreted as an "entity" or a "collective" in which case the looser interpretation of a law would be at play to create the "multi-member executive".</span>
