Answer: (A)
Dr. Pulaski is likely to find that approximately three-quarters (76 percent) of the subjects will conform to the group's judgment on at least one critical trial.
Explanation:
Solomon Asch conducted an experiment to find out to what extent people conform to group pressure.
He set up the experiment to include a single participant and seven confederates in a group. (A confederate is an accomplice of a researcher who is placed intentionally within an experiment by the researcher, so he can manipulate the experiment in his favor).
Each confederate was to give the same wrong answer to a certain question asked, while the participant was to provide his answer last.
Asch then observed if the single participant would tailor his answer according to the wrong answers provided by the confederates, or would provide the accurate answer.
Asch found out that from 12 trials conducted, "75% (three-quarters) of participants conformed to wrong answers provided at least once", while 25% did not conform at all.
He also discovered that on average of the trials carried out, one-third of the participants went along with the incorrect answer provided by the confederates.
Asch had also set up a control experiment with only a single participant and no confederates.
From the control experiment, he realized that less than 1% provided the wrong answer to the question asked.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can answer the following.
If I’m doing research on communication apprehension and I define high apprehension as someone who has at least 8 "ums," "uhs," or "ers" in a five minute period, I have created a(n): operational definition.
After doing part of your research, you will be able to get some definitions straight, created by yourself. In this case, you can come up with an operational definition. which means that you collect the proper data and define it in a clear, concise way. So your operational definition can express with clarity one of the objects of the study.
Explanation:
The prejudice is to say that lisa is predisposed to not being helped, can make her unwilling to admit that she feels bad and that she needs urgent help.
-The effect of the spectator; Some may look at you negatively, others reach out to you smoothly, you must be willing to ignore those bad attitudes.
Although we would say that in this case altruism goes from people to Lisa, in this case lisa must be modest and recognize that she needs help and must be altruistic when she is willing to accept it.
