1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AVprozaik [17]
3 years ago
9

Was resettlement seriously considered and why was it not used?

History
1 answer:
raketka [301]3 years ago
4 0
It was never seriously considered. It was not used because it would have been to hard, as there was many failed attempts at it before.
isuckatmathlol
2 years ago
too* but thank you
You might be interested in
Which european philosopher proposed that dividing the government into three branches would prevent any one person or group from
sammy [17]

The correct answer is D. Baron de Montesquieu.

Explanation

Charles Louis de Secondat, lord of la Brède and baron de Montesquieu (1689 - 1755) was a French philosopher who stood out for his ideas related to the intellectual and cultural movement of the Enlightenment. His works focused on the theory of separation of powers, which has been introduced in many constitutions around the world. His most famous work on the division of powers was his treatise "On the Spirit of the Laws" in which he states that in antiquity the functions of the State (necessary for the protection of the citizen) were monopolized in a single entity, which usually associates with despotism. Therefore, he proposes to distribute public powers among different entities, which limit each other, avoiding the monopolization of power in a single person or entity. So, the correct answer is D. Baron de Montesquieu.

4 0
3 years ago
How did the roman catholic church feel about scientific discoveries of Galileo and Copernicus?
andreev551 [17]
She was fearless, and crazier than him. she was his queen... and god help anyone who dared to disrespect his queen
6 0
3 years ago
What happened to the american indians after 1492
Yuri [45]

The answer is C, Their population decreased by nearly 20%

5 0
3 years ago
Why would China be at the forefront of determining the future of communism in Asia?
hammer [34]

Answer:

because if China does, the other smaller countries would follow

Explanation:

hope this helped :)

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"Prithvi Narayan Shah was an expert and far sighted politician and successful administrator." Explain.​
Serjik [45]

Answer:

PNS personally commanded many battles. The battles taught him how to handle complex situations and how he could come out victorious.

PNS focused on his goal and used all means (Saam, Daam, Danda, Bhed) for his campaign. As he fought battles, he understood why integrating the nearby kingdoms could be beneficial against the rising British hegemony in the region. He also realized that the diversity of Nepal could be exploited by British to divide the kingdom.

Explanation:

Prithvi Narayan Shah was not a strategist in the beginning. As soon as he became the king of Gorkha, he wanted to capture Nuwakot. In 1800 B.S., the first troop he sent under Biraj Thapa could not cross the Trishuli River. PNS, however, was not satisfied with the delay and sent another troop under Maheshwar Panta. The Gorkhali troop lost to the nature (Trishuli) as well the soldiers of Nuwakot.

After the loss, PNS became a military strategist. He went Benaras, brought some weapons and trained his soldiers so that they obey all commands without fear. He also developed the Marwat system for helping the soldier’s family if he died in a battle. He also used Yogis, the devotees of Gorakhnath, as spies.

He did not know how to use geography to strategical advantage before he himself led the Second Battle of Nuwakot in 1801 B.S. Had Kalu Pandey not found a way to divert huge number of Nuwakote soldiers, PNS could have died in the battle.

He had already understood politics, though. Before the Second Battle of Nuwakot, PNS had realized that the Chaubise Rajyas could be threat to his campaign and he might have to kill his kins in Kaski, Lamjung and Tanahun. To avoid the “sins”, he changed his gotra from Bhardwaj to Kasyap.

He also understood that Nepal (the then Kathmandu Valley—Kantipur, Patan, and Bhaktapur) would be against him as soon as he captured Nuwakot. So he kept a cordial relation with Ranjit Malla of Bhaktapur, who was also his Meet Baa (best friend’s father/father’s best friend)

PNS used the anarchy established by the Pradhans to make his brother Dal Mardan Shah the king of Patan from 1820–1822. When PNS attacked Kirtipur in 1822, Dal Mardan Shah did not oppose even though the Pradhans had urged him to do so. On Poush 3, 1822, PNS won the third battle of Kirtipur. Less than four years later, PNS was the king of Nepal.

PNS also understood how the people of Nepal Mandal lived. When he won the surrounding areas, he imposed a complete economic blockade which was one of the biggest reasons behind his victory over Kantipur, Patan and Bhaktapur.

Through treaties and diplomatic understandings, he was able to solve a lot of problems with the Chaubises and Baises, the British, the Tibetan and the Newas.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many years passed between 750 bce and 5th century ce?
    15·2 answers
  • QUESTION IN NEED OF HELP!!
    13·1 answer
  • How did vittoria colonna represent renaissance ideals
    6·1 answer
  • Name the Triple Alliance and Triple Entente into WW1?
    15·2 answers
  • Why is the study of modern history very important?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the best definition of profit
    15·1 answer
  • All of the following effects occurred as a result of Roman expansion following the Punic Wars except:
    14·1 answer
  • How did the exchanges cause some populations to decline in number, while others rose in number?
    8·1 answer
  • GIVING BRAINLIEST
    11·1 answer
  • Anybody please help me please?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!