I believe the answer is: False
Mandatory language is actually advisable to be used in this situation.
Using mandatory language would set a clear limitation that make the consumers understand the magnitude of the danger. This would make them much more likely to follow the written warning.
The government is using regulation tactic when it dictates what organizations can and cannot do. In this kind of tactic, the government usually directs organizations using regulation thru the formulation of rules and laws.
Various federal government agencies and departments issue regulations that carries out the legislation’s intent enacted by Congress.
The recourse for dealing with overzealous prosecutors includes Private admonition or reprimand. Hence, option A is appropriate.
<h3>What is the meaning of the Prosecutors?</h3>
In jurisdictions with either a civil law independent judiciary or a common law adversarial system, a prosecutor is a prosecuting attorney of the prosecution.
Federal prosecutors want to retry the case. A prosecutor is indeed a legal agent who formally accuses someone else of committing a felony by presenting an argument against that individual in a court of law.
A prosecutor is often a lawyer with a law degree who has been approved as a qualified attorney by the jurisdiction in which they're functioning. This could imply that they have been admitted toward the bar or, if applicable, earned a comparable qualification. Hence, option A is correct.
Learn more about Prosecutor here:
brainly.com/question/12057544
#SPJ1
Answer:
d) is a claim that can be tested
Explanation:
Answer: The government thought Native Americans stood in the way of westward expansion.
