Answer:
The loss of the financial institution is $413,000
Explanation:
Let's say that after 3 years the financial institution will receive:
0.5 * 10% of $10million
= 0.5 * 0.1 * 10000000
= $500,000
Then, they will pay 0.5 * 9% of $10M
= 0.5 * 0.09 * 10000000
= $450,000
Therefore, their immediate loss would be $500000 - $450000
= $50000.
Let's assume that forward rates are realized to value the rest of the swap.
The forward rates = 8% per annum.
Therefore, the remaining cash flows are assumed that floating payment is
0.5*0.08*10000000 =
$400,000
Received net payment would be:
500,000-400,000= $100,000. The total cost of default is therefore the cost of foregoing the following cash flows:
Year 3=$50,000
Year 3.5=$100,000
Year 4 = $100,000
Year 4.5= $100,000
Year 5 = $100,000
Discounting these cash flows to year 3 at 4% per six months, the cost of default would be $413,000
The main outputs of the developing the project team process are team performance assessments and enterprise environmental factors updates.
Hope this helps !
Photon
Answer:
The economic surplus will decrease by $2.20
Explanation:
$81.40 and $79.20 are <em>marginal </em>cost and benefit, which are the changes to total costs and total benefits due to producing and consuming one additional barrel of oil.
They can be used to calculate <em>change </em>to economic surplus, which is the change to the net economic value received by society, which is given by:
marginal benefit - marginal cost = $79.20 - $81.40 = - $2.20
Answer:
The four beliefs are true. But accuracy is demanded
Explanation:
1 Investment risk is important ir order to estimate the likelihood of occurrance of losses in the future.
2. money today is worth more than <em>the same amount </em>of money tomorrow.
3. inflation must be considered when making investment decisions, because makes money lose their value in the future.
4. investment opportunity costs must be considered. Is necessary to compare investments with financial products or other commercial activities.
Answer:
Terminate his employment
Explanation:
Based on the fact and information, Tibbits should be discharged from employment for his failure to disclose this relevant conviction. As a convicted offender, he is considered in the eyes of the law to be high-risk and should not be allowed to enter unsuspecting clients’ homes. It would be the company's liability if he acts non professionally and inappropriately at a jobsite.
