Answer:
Choose among alternatives
Explanation:
Answer:
A. Jack cannot bring in the evidence of the oral agreement because of the Parol Evidence Rule.
Explanation:
The Parol Evidence rule is a rule in the Anglo-American common law that governs or determines the types or kinds of evidence that parties to a contract dispute can introduce when trying to determine the specific terms of a contract.
The rule also prevents introduction of further evidences by a party after a final written document or agreement has been reached. Things such as the content of oral discussions from earlier in the negotiation process, as evidence of a different intent as to the terms of the contract. The rule states that "extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to vary a written contract". The term " patrol" refers to "word of mouth" hence it is referred to oral pleadings in a court case.
Therefore from the question, Jack cannot bring in evidence of oral agreement into the court for evaluation because of Patrol Evidence Rule.
The reported ending inventory was $43,112 thousand. If FIFO were used exclusively, the ending inventory would have been $6,964 thousand higher than reported, or $50,076 thousand.
Inventory refers to all the items, goods, goods, and materials that a business holds for sale in the market to make a profit. Example: If a newsagent uses a vehicle to deliver newspapers to customers, only the newspapers are considered inventory. A car is treated as an asset.
The manufacturer has three types of inventory. There are raw materials (awaiting processing), work in process (processed), and finished goods (preparing for shipment). The LIFO method assumes that the most recently purchased inventory units are sold.
Learn more about inventory at
brainly.com/question/24868116
#SPJ4
Financial aid it helps pay for things kids need
