Eventually <u>10</u>% of the united states would be given away through the homestead act.
To help expand the yank West and spur a financial boom, Congress handed the home Act of 1862, which supplied 160 acres of federal land to everyone who agreed to farm the land. The act disbursed millions of acres of western land to character settlers.
The Homestead Act, enacted all through the Civil struggle in 1862, furnished that any grownup citizen, or supposed citizen, who had never borne fingers in opposition to the U.S. government should declare 160 acres of surveyed authorities land. Claimants were required to stay on and “enhance” their plots with the aid of cultivating the land.
Learn more about Homestead Act here brainly.com/question/18126500
#SPJ4
Answer:
That sounds like the old Keynesian idea made popular during Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal: Cut taxes and increase government spending to “prime the pump” during a recession; raise taxes and reduce spending to slow down an “overheated” economy. Keynesianism seemed to have been finally laid to rest in the 1980s when President Ronald Reagan argued for a tax cut on supply‐side grounds, and even liberal economists now agree that such fine‐tuning has little effect on the economy.
Explanation:
1. In a free country, money belongs to the people who earn it. The most fundamental reason to cut taxes is an understanding that wealth doesn’t just happen, it has to be produced. And those who produce it have a right to keep it. We may agree to give up a portion of the wealth we create in order to pay for such public goods as national defense and a system of justice. But we don’t give the government an unlimited claim on our money to use as it sees fit.
The correct answer is the semantic level of encoding.
When you are trying to memorize something using semantic encoding, it means that you are using tools such as mnemonics to better learn information and retrieve it from memory more easily. Semantics has to do with language, meaning, and words.
In the second time ever, the Court used<span> its power of </span>judicial review<span> to rule an act of Congress (the Missouri Compromise) unconstitutional. ... Northerners charged that after Chief Justice Taney had shown that </span>Scott<span>, as a Negro, had no right to bring a case into a federal court, he should have ended his decision.</span>
