Solution :
It is given that Fizzo and Pop Hop sells orange soda. Fizzo advertises about his drinks while Pop Hop does not advertises.
According to the matrix provided we can conclude that :
-- If Fizzo wishes to advertise about his soda drinks, he will earn a profit of 8 million dollar and if Pop Hop do advertises and a 15 million dollar if Pop Hop does not advertises.
-- If Fizzo does not advertise, it will earn profit of about 2 million dollar if Pop Hop advertises and 9 million dollar if Pop Hop does not advertises.
-- When Pop Hop wished to advertise , Fizzo will make a higher profit if he chooses to advertise.
-- When Pop Hop do not advertise, Fizzo will make a higher profit when it chooses to advertise.
And if both the firms acts independently and they start off not advertising, then --- both firms will advertise as both of them will earn highest profits each.
If both the firms collude and both firms start off not advertising, the strategies they will end up is that both the firms will not advertise as the joint profit will be maximized.
Answer:
B, Indirect incentive
Explanation:
An incentive is anything that motivates an individual to behave in a certain way. An incentive could range from money to many other things and it is the reason why an individual acts in a certain way.
For example, salary and bonuses are incentives for workers. This makes the worker work better and harder and more efficiently because he/she knows that there is something to encourage him for doing his/her work diligently.
Incentive can be direct or indirect as in the case of the above question.
In the case of the above question, a generous disability insurance can motivate workers to falsely claim to be disabled. This means that the financial implication of the insurance package for disability is most likely the only reason for workers to claim false disability.
Cheers.
Answer:
Explanation:
Value assigned to bonds =
Value of bonds without warrants/(value of bonds without warrants+value of warrants)*Issue price
Value assigned to warrants =
Value of warrants/(value of bonds without warrants+Value of warrants)
Value assigned to bonds = 115,200/(115,200+28,800) * 140,000 = 0.8*140,000 = 112,000
Value assigned to warrants = 28,800/144,000 * 140,000 = 28,000
Journal entries:
Dr Cash 140,000
Dr Discount on bonds payable (171,000-112,000) 59,000
Cr Bonds payable 171,000
Cr Paid in capital-Stock warrants 28,000
Answer:
a) Elastic
b) total revenue is increased
Explanation:
a) The demand is elastic over the given range.
The demand is elastic because, with the variation in the price of the brownies the demand for the brownies varied too i.e the demand changes.
b) Now,
if the elasticity is same for the decline in price from $1.00 to $1.50 i.e 300
the revenue will increase as:
when the price was $1.00 the demand is 100
i.e
the total revenue = $1.00 × 100 = $100
now,
when the price decline to $0.50 the demand changes to 300
i.e
the total revenue = $0.50 × 300 = $150
hence,
the total revenue is increased.
Answer:
-The right to convert the shares to common shares
-The right to redeem the preferred shares for cash
