Question:
An express warranty is created when a seller:
A) makes an affirmation of fact or promise concerning the goods that becomes part of the basis of the bargain.
B) uses descriptive terms as a part of the bargaining process, but the buyer does not take it into consideration when making the purchase.
C) sells goods meant for use for ordinary purposes.
D) avoids using a sample or model as the basis for the contract.
Answer:
The correct choice is A)
An express warranty is created in the contract when a supplier makes a promise concerning the goods that the buyer can hold on to as an incentive to purchase the product.
Explanation:
For example, if a consumer buys a Laptop online, but when it arrives the item is the wrong specifications, wrong color, or is dented or damaged in anyway, an <em>express warranty</em> might entitle the consumer to a refund or replacement.
This warranty usually is stated upfront prior to or during the execution of the sales transaction.
Cheers!
Answer:
Journal entry to eliminate Sale to Peter Company
Debit : Sales Revenue (Sally Company ) $50,000
Credit : Cost of Sales (Peter Company) $50,000
Explanation:
Peter Company and Sally Company are in a group and Peter Company is the Parent whilst Sally Company is the subsidiary.
For 2019 Eliminate an Intragroup Transactions that occur between Peter Company and Sally Company.
Answer:
It will take 1.97 years to payback the machine.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
It will cost $7,500 to acquire a cotton candy cart. Cart sales are expected to be $3,800 a year for four years.
We need to determine the amount of time required to payback the machine.
Year 1= 3,800 - 7,500= -3,700
Year 2= 3,800 - 3,700= 100
3,700/3,800= 0.97
It will take 1.97 years to payback the machine.
Answer:
Follows are the responses to the given points:
Explanation:
In point a:
Yeah, throughout the state court they will ever sue against fraud. As base with the that State is appropriate so because the main place of work is specific budget inventory representatives Inc.
In point b:
Thomas couldn't sue for cheating at the federal court successfully, because equality in nationality would be the only conceivable way. Because as a federal problem also isn't involved, Thomas and both are comprehensive residents of Michigan weren’t diverse for this situation. The business is a resident of all its corporate headquarters and the State of formation.
In point c:
Throughout this situation, silver can claim nationality plurality, as Oklahoma's comprehensive would not be a citizen. It simple company does company in such a state doesn't render that business a citizen. However, if silver has been damaged in terms of $75,000, this failure combined with citizenship diversity would allow it to sue extensively in a federal court. This event does not tell everyone how slowly he lost, however, the facts weren't enough to make a correct judgment.
