Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect
<h3>Complete question</h3>
Beth says that the graph of g(x)=x-5+1 is a translation of 5 units to the left and 1 unit up of f(x) = x. She continues to explain that the point (0,0) on the square root function would be translated to the point (-5,1) on the graph of g(x). Is Beth's description of the transformation correct? Explain
<h3>How to determine the true statement?</h3>
The functions are given as:
g(x) = x - 5 + 1
f(x) = x
When the function f(x) is translated 5 units left, we have:
f(x + 5) = x + 5
When the above function is translated 1 unit up, we have:
f(x + 5) + 1 = x + 5 + 1
This means that the actual equation of g(x) should be
g(x) = x + 5 + 1
And not g(x) = x - 5 + 1
By comparison;
g(x) = x - 5 + 1 and g(x) = x + 5 + 1 are not the same
Hence, Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect
Read more about transformation at:
brainly.com/question/17121698
#SPJ1
Answer: 20−12/3=?16
16=16
True
Step-by-step explanation: hope this help:)
3(100-b) = 6b
300-3b = 6b
+3b +3b
300 = 9b
/9 /9
b=33.33333... or 33 1/3
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The expression can be factored using the factors of 14, 2 and 7, which add to give 9.
x² -9x +14 = (x -2)(x -7)
One of the factors is (x -2).
