Answer:
The best way to find terms of trade that will ensure that two entities are in the best terms of trade will be to look at the opportunity costs of the various products they produce.
A high opportunity cost in one product relative to that of the other entity means the entity with the higher opportunity cost should be trading with the entity with the lower opportunity cost and vice versa.
For example, assume that an entity "A" produces both rice and beans whilst an entity "B" also produces rice and beans too.
If the opportunity cost to A of producing Beans is 300 bags of rice whilst the opportunity cost to B of producing Beans is 120 bags of rice, and the opportunity cost to A of producing rice is 180 bags of beans whilst it is 250 bags of beans to B, the principles of comparative advantage require that A should focus more on producing rice and purchase beans from B whilst B should focus more on producing beans and purchase rice from A.
Cheers!
Answer:
A) Using a change management system to influence performance
Explanation:
First of all, since the change was proposed by the customer, any delay in the construction project caused by their new request should not trigger the damage clause.
The contractor should use a change management system so the existing baseline is not altered by the delay. A change management system is responsible for managing all the changes that might occur during the project's inception until its completion. It is important that all changes or alterations to the original schedule are properly recorded and authorized (in this case to prevent the damage clause).
By using the change management system, the organization has a standardized methodology for handling changes in the project's schedule. This way any negative impact can be reduced.
Answer: Is the business manegement?
Explanation: If what unit and lesson i did all
Answer:
b. She should develop herself as the EMV of developing is $1.125 million, which is higher than the EMV of selling.
Explanation:
The probability of discovered oil = 0.25 (25%)
Selling the exploration right= Selling Price + Probability of discovered oil × Royalty% × Future Profit
= $200,000 + 0.25 × 0.25 × $7,500,000 = $668,750
Developing = Probability of finding the oil × Future Profits - Cost of Well
= 0.25 × $7,500,000 - $750,000 = $1,125,000
= $1.125 million
Therefore the EMV for selling the exploration rights is less than the developing, the landowner will develop the site by his own.
Answer:
For such a report , the sql query required would be:
SELECT emp_id, curr_salary, curr_salary*1.03 AS inc_salary FROM Employee;
Explanation:
For such a report , the sql query required would be:
SELECT emp_id, curr_salary, curr_salary*1.03 AS inc_salary FROM Employee;
In the above sql query employee id is emp_id , curr_salary is the current salary column. "curr_salary*1.03" is been made because an increment of 3% means salary + salary*3% , that is , salary*1.03.
