Answer:
17 times
Explanation:
Data provided in the given question :-
Net Sales = $1,250,000
Average account Receivable = $73,500
Net Income = $53,150
So, the accounts receivable turnover ratio is given below :-
Accounts receivable turnover ratio = Net sales ÷ Average accounts receivable
= $1,250,000 ÷ $73,500
= 17 times
Hence the net income is ignored for calculating the account receivable turnover ratio.
Answer: You are trying to find out if the statement is true or false? It is FALSE.
Explanation: Analysts should be concerned with the material movements in the company's financial statements. Although as stated in the question, small changes could amount to material movement but that applies in situations where there is a huge outflow but at the same time, there is similar inflow, so the net effect is negligible on a particular financial statements line item. This instance is not relevant to financial analysts but only the concern of internal control and or internal audit.
Financial analysts are interested in what the key drivers of the financial statements are. These drivers in most cases are an avenue to explain what has transpired in the financials between the current period and the preceding one by way of writing a commentary and providing a succinct and holistic explanation of the financial statements.
It would be time consuming and too operational if analysts are concerned with every percentage movement in the financial statements.
Based on the calculation done, there are 15 baskets of peaches.
x + y = 23 ..... i
20x + 18y = 430 ...... ii
From equation i, x = 23 - y ..... iii
Put equation iii into ii
20x + 18y = 430
20(23 - y) + 18y = 430
460 - 20y + 18y = 430
2y = 30
y = 30/2 = 15
x + y = 23.
x + 15 = 23
x = 23 - 15 = 8
Learn more about equations on:
brainly.com/question/13763238
Answer:
The correct answer is: a new law that interferes with economic efficiency.
Explanation:
A production possibilities frontier shows all the points where production is efficient. The resources are being completely employed. The points above the frontier are unattainable. The points below the frontier are attainable but inefficient.
If there is a movement from the frontier to a point below it. This means inefficient allocation of resources. It can happen because of some law interfering in efficient allocation of resources.
Answer:
<u>PetSmart</u> is an example of a speciality store.
Explanation:
It sells stuff only related to pets, unlike the other stores mentioned.
