Answer:
a) Portfolio ABC's expected return is 10.66667%.
Explanation:
Some information is missing:
Stock Expected Standard Beta
return deviation
A 10% 20% 1.0
B 10% 10% 1.0
C 12% 12% 1.4
The expected return or portfolio AB = (1/2 x 10%) + (1/2 x 10%) = 10% (it is the same as the required rate for stock A or B)
The expected return or portfolio ABC = (weight of stock A x expected return of stock A) + (weight of stock B x expected return of stock B) + (weight of stock C x expected return of stock C) = (1/3 x 10%) + (1/3 x 10%) + (1/3 x 12%) = 3.333% + 3.333% + 4% = 10.667% <u>THIS IS CORRECT</u>
Options B, C, D and E are wrong.
Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entries are shown below:
Cash A/c Dr $582,000 ($600,000 × 0.97)
Discount on Bonds Payable A/c Dr $18,000
To Bonds payable A/c $600,000
(Being the issuance of the bond is recorded and the remaining balance is debited to the discount on bond payable account)
Cash A/c Dr $612,000 ($600,000 × 1.02)
To Bonds payable A/c $600,000
To Premium on bonds payable A/c $12,000
(Being the issuance of the bond is recorded and the remaining balance is credited to the premium on bond payable account)
Answer:
Bad debt expense for 2016 should be: c. $8,520
Explanation:
As of December 31, 2016, Amy Jo's Appliances had accounts receivable of $313,000 and the allowance for uncollectible accounts should be 3% of accounts receivable
Bad debts are estimated: 3% x $313,000 = $9,390
Amy Jo's Appliances had $870 in the allowance for uncollectible accounts
Bad debts expense = $9,390 - $870 = $8,520
The entry will be made:
Debit Bad debts expense $8,520
Credit Allowance for uncollectible accounts $8,520
Answer:
Negligent insider.
Explanation:
<u>Negligent insider</u> are poorly trained and inadequately managed employees who mean well but have the potential to cause much damage.
Negligent insiders are the employees who are given access to the organization network. They are the ones who unintentionally make an error with the security privacy or due to their negligence they get trapped in phishing emails, risky websites, leakage of the company´s confidential data, etc. These mistakes cause a big loss to the company and these insiders turn out to be a threat to the organization. The company needs to strategies on how to mitigate these threats. They can mitigate these issues by properly training and controlling the accessibility of employees.
Answer:
Following are the solution to this question:
Explanation:
The metaphor of gambling, chess, and rallying related only to the degree of growing complexity and significance of different roles. In typical management needs and allocates capital, so named players. A senior executive not just uses the resource and also serves as a key motivator for both the company's so-called chess-making goals. Its successful leaders, however, not just to lead to accomplishing organizational targets, and also motivate individuals to serve a better future, and people are advised to rally to the metaphor is therefore said to have been accurate and is focused on the various positions and levels performed by the organization, thus distinguishing roles.
