Note:
I wasn't able to access the Chester Income Statement but I successfully accessed a similar question Digby.
The Complete Question is as under:
Refer to the HR Reports in the Inquirer. Through past investments in recruiting and training Digby has obtained a productivity index of 109.6%. This means that Digby's labor costs would be increased by 9.6% if it did not have these productivity improvements. This is a competitive advantage that Digby can sustain or even widen further if its competitors have no HR initiatives. Now, refer to the Income Statement in Digby's Annual Report. How much did Digby's productivity improvements save it in direct labor costs (in thousands) last year?
A. $766
B. $29818
C. $3137
D. $3211
Answer:
Option D. $3,137
Explanation:
The Productivity Index of 9.6% shows that if the improvement plan is implemented then the efficiency gains would result in saving of 9.6% of total direct cost. So if we total the direct cost for the year for all of the four products then we have an amount of $32,680 which is given at the second last column.
The amount saved last year would be:
Savings = $32,680 * 9.6% = $3,137
Hence the option C is correct here.
Real estate commission fee
Answer:
i dont get it, is there a question?
Explanation:
Answer:
Credits are made to Common Stock $30,000 and Paid in capital in excess of Par value $12,000
Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below;
Cash $42,000 (3,000 shares at $14)
To Common Stock $30,000 (3,000 shares at $10)
To Paid in capital in excess of par value $12,000 (3,000 shares at $4)
(Being issuance of the common stock is recorded)
Here cash is debited as it increased the assets and credited the common stock & paid in capital as it also increased the stockholder equity
True. This demonstrates that buyer has confidence on buying products that are branded. She has trust that the product can satisfy her because the brand already earned a reputation in its field. It also shows that she passed scrutiny on the bought product.
