1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Serhud [2]
4 years ago
13

Sam frequently consults with followers, obtains their ideas and opinions, and integrates their suggestions into the decisions ab

out how the group or organization will proceed. Which of the primary four leadership behaviors identified as part of path-goal theory is he exemplifying?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Schach [20]4 years ago
3 0

The correct answer would be, Participative.

He is exemplifying the Participative leadership behavior as part of path goal theory.

Explanation:

Path Goal Theory is a leadership theory. This theory was developed by Robert House in 1971. He was a graduate from Ohio State University. According to his theory, there are four primary leadership styles. These are:

  • Positive and Negative Leaders or Bosses.
  • Autocratic or Authoritarian leadership.
  • Democratic or Participative leadership.
  • The Laissez-faire or Free-rein leadership.

In the given question, when Sam frequently consults with followers, obtain their ideas and opinions, integrate their suggestions into decision, then he is actually exemplifying the Participative leadership behavior, which encourages the participation or feedback from the followers.

Learn more about Leadership styles at:

brainly.com/question/3486362

#LearnWithBrainly

You might be interested in
trading post empires were the most loosely controlled settlements. the largest trading post empire in North America was built by
Aleksandr [31]
The Dutch had not only the largest but also the most productive trading post  settlement in North America. The Dutch were some of the world's greatest traders/merchants.
5 0
4 years ago
Evidence of prior negotiations, prior agreements, or contemporaneous oral agreements that contradict or vary the terms of a writ
UkoKoshka [18]

Answer: Parol evidence rule.

Explanation:

Parol evidence rule is the regulation that restricts the presentation of any evidence while oral contract before the existing period negotiation that can tend to manipulate, alter or contradict the terms mentioned in the written contract .

This law usually comes into action when some particular terms and expression of contract is being determined or completed. This rule is implied because it can change the contract or agreement when it has already reached the final stage. This law is followed in Anglo-American region.

6 0
3 years ago
Central and state govemments intuence each other in
defon

Answer:

In the Federal system, there is a sharing of powers between the State government and the Centre government. Both state governments and the central governments enjoy concurrent powers, as well as exclusive powers and this distribution of powers, helps both these governments to explain the division of powers properly among them.  

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which consequence resulted from unresolved international conflicts throughout the 20th century?
mestny [16]
The current international nuclear threat of North Korea and development of their ICBM's and nuclear missiles. This is due mainly because we never truly "finished" the international Korean War and only came to a mutual agreement of a cease fire, which resulted in the eventually closing off of North Korea and the creation of the DMZ-which in turn creates the consequence and issues of North Korea being a "rogue state" and the development of their nuclear warheads. Hopefully this helps :)
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the ""Tragedy of the Commons"". Explain how the concept might apply to an unregulated industry that is a source of water
GuDViN [60]

Answer:Tragedy of the commons is referred to as a circumstance where under a system of shared-resource, individuals tend to act independently in accordance with their own self-interest, they tend to act contrary to the common good. Therefore, depleting and spoiling the main source of that resource through their actions.

In an unregulated industry which acts as the main source responsible for water pollution, most of the organization might tend to act irresponsibly without having the tendency to act in favour of the environment and people living in that surrounding. Thus contributing more towards water pollution.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the presence of the french in north america affect britain and its colonies?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a challenge to the Cuban economy?
    5·2 answers
  • The primary way government raises revenue is through
    6·2 answers
  • Pictures made of small pieces of colored glass or stone
    13·2 answers
  • Alison fell in love with jude at their first meeting. she thought he was very attractive and wanted to have a relationship with
    5·1 answer
  • Journalist Walter Lippmann suggested thata) Polling, even when done scientifically, cannot be trusted because it is in people's
    6·1 answer
  • What is language? In your own words.
    11·2 answers
  • What did Renaissance Social Classes look like and how did they affect the people at the time?
    5·2 answers
  • What led to the rise of communism in the Soviet Union?
    9·1 answer
  • What is the Preamble? (Site 1)
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!