Post hoc: fallacy in logic that assumes a cause-and-effect relationship because of sequence.
<em>Post hoc </em>is a fallacy since it implies that one event is the consequence of a previous event just because it comes later. Usually, if one event is after another, it does not mean one event is the cause or consequence of another just because they are correlative in time.
Inferences: reasoning from several particular examples to establish a general principle.
<em>Inference </em>means reaching a conclusion based on evidence.
Inductive reasoning: drawing conclusions from implied information.
<em>Inductive reasoning </em>uses data or information given to reach a general conclusion. it goes from specific to general.
Deductive reasoning: drawing a particular conclusion from general premises.
<em>Deductive reasoning</em> approach is based on a general statement or theory in order to reach a logical conclusion.
Answer:
Dear (Kail),
I appreciate your invitation to be one of the special guests at your wedding; unfortunately, I will not make it for the event since (indicate the reason).
I can imagine I wouldn’t be at your wedding. Congrats on your special day and I wish you the best for the day. May the day be filled with unlimited joy and celebrations I will visit you soon after your honeymoon.
Yours,
(Dream,)
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is examples.
Explanation:
You see in the text that:
1.) There are no questions so that means that hypotheticals will not be the answer because hypotheses are mostly questions
2.) Next is statistics, there are no number related info in the text so that doesn't work.
3.) That examples and quotations are left. Well there are no quotation marks so there are no quotations meaning that examples is the only logical answer
Hope this helps :)
Tough question, but I think the correct answer is #3.