Answer:
b) third-degree price discrimination.
Explanation:
The price gouging happens on prices when is carried out by the seller, goods, services or goods to a higher level than what is considered acceptable or fair and potentially considered unethically. This usually occurs after a demand or supply shock. Common examples include price increases for basic needs after hurricanes or other natural disasters.
First-degree discrimination (perfect price discrimination) appears when a business charges the maximum possible price for each unit consumed because prices are diverse among some units. In this case, where a company charges a different price for every good or service sold.
Second-degree price discrimination is the concept in which a company charges a different price when there are demands for different quantities consumed, such as quantity discounts on bulk purchases.
Third-degree price discrimination is the case in which a company charges a different price to different consumer groups. This is the type of most common type of price discrimination. If we see in the question there is given distinctive ticket price offers to senior citizens and/or students. That’s why we should choose third-degree price discrimination.
Answer:
Stewart will probably have to accept a higher level of risk
.
Explanation:
Hence, a large-risk investment is one in which the risks of failure, or of losing some or all of the asset, are greater than the average.
- These opportunities often offer investors the ability for greater returns in exchange for embracing the degree of risk associated with that.
- In saving account he gets 3% rate of return but also gets a lower rate of risk and does not earn much.
If he invests his money in higher-risk fields like shares, he may get a higher profit.
Answer:
Wyatt
Explanation:
High outcome interpendence is a concept that encourages cooperation between members on a team. It shows that if a team wins all members will benefit, and if the team fails all members will be adversely affected.
In this scenario Wyatt who is a slacker in the team of Nick will stand to gain more.
In a high outcome interpendence scenario Nick will be forced to improve on the performance of Wyatt in order to meet team objectives.
The other average workers will only gain a little from increased cooperation.
