Answer:
The explanation is below
Explanation:
A. Shutdown point is achieved when price equal AVC. when price lowers than the AVC, firm shutdown.
VC = q^2
AVC = q
So,
P = q is the shutdown point.
B. For profit maximizing level of output,
P = MR = MC
500 = 20 + 2q
q = 240 units
So, profit maximization level of output = 240 units
C. Firm level supply curve = MC curve above the shutdown point
Number of firms = 5
So,
Industry supply curve = 10*MC = 200+20Q
Industry supply curve = 200+20Q
It shows that MC curve above the shutdown point is supply curve.
Answer:
4.16%
Explanation:
to calculate Singapore's economic growth rate we can use the future value formula (we could also use the rule of 72 but it is not very exact):
future value = present value x (1 + r) ⁿ
- future value = 900
- present value = 450
- n = 17
- r = ?
900 = 450 (1 + r)¹⁷
(1 + r)¹⁷ = 900 / 450 = 2
1 + r = ¹⁷√2 = 1.0416
r = 1.0416 - 1 = 0.0416 or 4.16%
If there is a withdrawal of cash from a bank which does not go below the required reserves, the withdrawal will not change money supply but will reduce bank checkable deposits.
<h3>What does withdrawing from a bank do?</h3>
If one withdraws money from a bank, it will reduce the bank's checkable deposits as these are made of cash that was deposited by entities.
As regards total money supply however, these withdrawals will only have an impact if the withdrawal causes bank reserves to fall below the required reserves.
Find out more on required reserves at brainly.com/question/10684321.
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
It is given that both Starbucks coffee as well as Dunkin Donuts coffee are both perfect for me. They taste same and the quality of the coffee in both are same. The price of Starbucks coffee is more than the coffee in Dunkin Donuts. As a customer I would prefer the lower cost item i.e. the Dunkin Donuts coffee.
After the pandemic, the price of the Starbucks coffee have increased. But my utility of purchasing coffee from Dunkin Donuts is not changed as the price of the Dunkin Donuts coffee is still the lowest between the two. So I will continue buying coffee from Dunkin Donuts like before. Thus my utility remains unchanged.
Answer:
a. continue with the project provided that the additional solar electricity is worth more than $10 million.
Explanation:
It is provided that after cost overruns of the project is $10 million, which can never be recovered, thus, it is a kind of sunk cost.
Sunk cost is the cost which is made previously, and now in no manner will affect the decision, as cannot be recovered.
Therefore, such cost is ignored.
Further provided additional cost will be $12 million, therefore, now the society shall make a rational choice whether to continue the project providing solar electricity of $10 million, as in case of amount of solar energy is $32 million or $22 million, then the choice is obvious to accept,
Rational choice will be for solar electricity worth $10 million.
Therefore, correct statement is
a. continue with the project provided that the additional solar electricity is worth more than $10 million.
