It was one of the first major international crisis of the Cold War. Since the Soviets blocked the Western Allies' railways, roads etc. the Western Allies organized the <span>Berlin airlift, where aircrews from </span>the United States Air Force, the British Royal Air Force, the Royal Canadian Air Force, the Royal Australian Air Force, the Royal New Zealand Air Force, and the South African Air Force, provided to the West Berliners up to 8,893 tons of necessities each day, such as fuel and food.
Answer:
The first question is an opinion question so there really is no wrong answer as long as you provide reasoning. Personally, I think Philip's failed involvement in the 30 years war was his most significant loss. As a result of the Treaty of Westphalia, Philip II lost possession of the Netherlands as well as demonstrated his inability to keep Spanish lands Catholic. It is also one of the first significant failures that showed the decline of Spain.
As the son of the Holy Roman Emperor Philip II was influenced by the political affairs of the Holy Roman Empire (HRE). Because of his strong ties to the HRE, Philip II was an ally to the Empire and shared many of the same beliefs. Both Philip's involvement in the 30 years war and the Protestant persecution in Spain show strong Catholic ties and allegiance to the HRE (keep in mind that the Pope lived in the HRE and held a lot of sway over the Empire).
<span>The Supreme Court is most likely to be accused of judicial activism in cases involving: protection of individual rights.
Writing for the conservative group, <em>The Heritage Foundation</em>, Elizabeth Slattery defines judicial activism as "w</span><span>hen judges fail to apply the Constitution or laws impartially according to their original public meaning, regardless of the outcome, or do not follow binding precedent of a higher court and instead decide the case based on personal preference."
Cases involving individual rights are likely to elicit charges of judicial activism because the Constitution does not spell out each and every sort of right citizens may have. New questions come up that were not considered or specified at the time the Constitution was written. For instance, <em>Roe v. Wade </em>(1973) addressed the question of abortion and an individual's right to privacy. <em>Obergefell v. Hodges </em>(2015) addressed the legality of same-sex marriage. Both are cases of individual rights, where the Constitution did not give direct instruction on the issues at stake. The decisions on those issues, to allow abortion and to allow same-sex marriage, both are criticized by conservatives as instances of judicial activism.</span>
Answer:
its hurting my brain cells
Explanation:
