First of all it was the framers. the challenge
was the antifederalists who went out against them and tried to turn the people against them. they met it by adding the bill of rights to the Constitution
Well, that depends on which "land" you're talking about.
If it's the United States of America, then the <em>Constitution</em> is the supreme law of the land.
The Constitution lays out the structure and powers of the federal government in great detail.
Then it says that any powers not specifically reserved for the federal government belong to the states.
Answer:
True, the Senate could vote absolute power to a dictator.
Explanation:
Dictator.
Dictator, in the Roman Republic, a temporary magistrate with extraordinary powers, nominated by a consul on the recommendation of the Senate and confirmed by the Comitia Curiata (a popular assembly).
Dictators were then named for lesser functions such as the holding of elections in certain cases.
The Senate could vote to grant absolute power to one man, called a dictator, for a temporary period. During the first 300 years of the Republic, dictators were often called on when Rome faced an invasion or some internal danger.
<span>The correct answer here is B - the situation that best illustrates how the principle of limited government aims to protect individual rights is the fact that citizens cannot be punished for speaking out against the government. This is certainly true of democratic countries, however there are still a lot of countries such as the dictatorship of North Korea.</span>
