Explain how the Cherokee Removal act was unconstitutional.

History

1 answer:

Naya [18.7K]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

At the time the constitution did not encompass the rights of the indigenous or native people. The concept of the victor taking the spoils while the conquered suffered the consequences was the viewpoint that was expressed.

If the concept of the Indian Removal Act is aggravating - read the Sioux Treaty of 1868. In this document it takes away as fast as it gives rights to the Sioux people.:

You might be interested in

Which of the following is an example of the

aalyn [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

It's the second one.

6 0

3 years ago

What Supreme Court case established the principle judicial review?

notka56 [123]

Answer:

Marbury V. Madison

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

In which two sub-saharan african countries did brutal civil wars break out in the early 1990s?

Andru [333]

A sequence of brutal civil wars tore through the Mano River Basin sub-vicinity of West Africa.

Starting in Liberia and spreading to Sierra Leone and Côte d’Ivoire, violent battle ripped societies aside. kingdom authority dissolved, establishments of governance collapsed, millions had been compelled to flee, and West Africa changed into threatened with destabilization.

A civil war or intrastate struggle is a war between organized groups inside the same nation. The aim of one aspect may be to take control of the USA or a region, to acquire independence for a vicinity, or to change government guidelines.

Learn more about civil war here brainly.com/question/1020924

#SPJ4

6 0

2 years ago

Question #1: A way to avoid the draft was to receive a college deferment, by which a young man enrolled in a

fiasKO [112]

Answer:

blacks

Explanation:

The word 'white' has its opposite to be black

8 0

3 years ago

What group is most responsible for the addition of the Bill of Rights?a.Anti-Federalistsb.Federalistsc.Patriotsd.Loyalists

kap26 [50]

Answer:

b.Federalists

Explanation:

Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.

Hope this helps <3

4 0

3 years ago