3 years ago

Explain how the Cherokee Removal act was unconstitutional.

1 answer:

8 0

Answer:

At the time the constitution did not encompass the rights of the indigenous or native people. The concept of the victor taking the spoils while the conquered suffered the consequences was the viewpoint that was expressed.

If the concept of the Indian Removal Act is aggravating - read the Sioux Treaty of 1868. In this document it takes away as fast as it gives rights to the Sioux people.:

You might be interested in

How did the Kingdom of Kush influence Egypt’s military?<br><br> .

Ivanshal [37]

Answer: C. ( the 3rd answer)

Explanation: (pls mark brainliest if u can)

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In photo, please help

ahrayia [7]

Answer:

alex it is me parker....

ur bf...

i...miss you....Jamie....and i are not......friends anymore

and....u...vanished...

im very lonely..and i need u so much right now

...........................

i will wait

i love you

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

In what era was the great sphinx constructed

Kay [80]

It was constructed in 2500 B.C.

7 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The supreme executive power shall be vested in a governor, who shall be commander-in-chief of all military forces of the state n

Tju [1.3M]

The correct answer for this question is "President."

The position described in the quote above compares closest to the national position of a President of a nation or a country. He shall be commander-in-chief of all military forces of the state not in active service of <span>the United States.</span>

4 0

3 years ago

In which of the following two ways did the Roman empire differ from the Roman republic? Select all that apply.

RUDIKE [14]

They lost a lot of gold

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers