The reason given by the author for presenting the false dilemma that people should either own a dog or no pet at all is option B.
<h3>An excerpt from Martin’s essay</h3>
The excerpt seeks to compare ownership of dogs and cats as pet animals. Dog owners are characterised with more maturity and knowledgeable that cat owners. Dogs are more reliant on their owners.
Therefore, the correct answer is option B; dogs are more reliant on their owners than other pets.
Learn more about excerpt:
brainly.com/question/21400963
Answer:
The former has a serious mood, while the latter has a lighter mood.
Explanation:
In “Because I could not stop for Death” Emily Dickinson uses imagery to portray the death and immortality, how these go together, also that she is now willing to leave this world with them. She describes these two characters as kind and respectful beings. On the other hand, if we analyze Dickinson’s diction in "Some Keep the Sabbath Going to Church", according to the time, that selection of words was consider unpretentious and straightforward.
Answer: It depends on how much money you make.
Explanation: The United States is a diverse country. Americans by and large are workaholics, and for all that we have a reputation for being lazy, nowhere else is leisure and idleness less valued as a legitimate way to spend one’s time as in the US.
Due in part to its location, the US is safe from foreign invasion. Canada is an agreeable neighbor, and some of us even contemplate converting to Canadianism on a daily basis.
What they don't tell you about the US is that there is a yawning economic gap, and while the wealthy become unfathomably wealthier, the standard of living for everyone else is plummeting fast, to the point that it's actually disgraceful. We are the richest country in the world, and yet we have one of the highest rates of child poverty in the developed world. There is no excuse for that.
<span>A nation cannot expect peace by making preparations for war</span>
Thoreau now turns to his personal experiences with civil disobedience. He says that he hasn't paid a poll tax for six years and that he spent a night in jail once because of this. His experience in jail did not hurt his spirit: "I saw that, if there was a wall of stone between me and my townsmen, there was a still more difficult one to break through, before they could get to be as free as I was." Since the State couldn't reach his essential self, they decided to punish his body. This illustrated the State's ultimate weakness, and Thoreau says that he came to pity the State. The masses can't force him to do anything; he is subject only to those who obey a higher law. He says that he has to obey his own laws and try to flourish in this way.
The night in prison, he recounts, was "novel and interesting enough." His roommate had been accused of burning down a barn, though Thoreau speculated that the man had fallen asleep drunk in the barn while smoking a pipe. Thoreau was let in on the gossip and history of the jail and was shown several verses that were composed in the jail. The workings of the jail fascinated him, and staying in jail that night was like traveling in another country. He felt as if he was seeing his town through the light of the middle ages--as if he had never heard the sounds of his town before. After the first night, however, somebody interfered and paid his tax, and so he was released from prison the next day. Upon Thoreau's release, it seemed some kind of change had come over the town, the State and the country. He realized that the people he lived with were only friends in the good times. They were not interested in justice or in taking any risks. He soon left the town and was out of view of the State again.
