This can fit into the category of Hasty Generalization, this is, that you generalize with a lack of evidence or better,reasons as of to state that the trilogy of the Lord of The Rings isgood. It is good because it is good, if the first part is good, then all the trilogy is good.
Another option might be a fallacy called <em>ad populum </em> which takes place whenever you appeal to the public knowledge of something to prove it is true. In this case forexample, you could say: the reviews are giving this movie 5 stars, so this movie is good, because people like it.
Answer: B
Explanation: a summation is a final statement that a lawyer gives to the judge to encourage the judge that their client is not guilty.
answer d is wrong because jurors don't solely decide whether the client is guilty or not
answer c is wrong because a summation has nothing to do with the "judges instruction"
Answer a is wrong because a summation is a closing statement that the lawyer makes.
Well according to my prior knowledge I was thinking that maybe in midnight is at 12:00 then isnt afternight at 12:01? Questionare of the year goes to the guy im sitting next to named Jaysie!!
The answer is
<span>It is the means by which we acquire basic knowledge of the world around us.
John was all about anti ignorance.
</span>
C - Wooden
Hope this has helped :)
