1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aksik [14]
3 years ago
13

Mark Johnson saves a fixed percentage of his salary at the end of each year. This year he saved $2,000. For each of the next 5 y

ears, he expects his salary to increase at an 10% annual rate, and he plans to increase his savings at the same 10% rate. There will be a total of 6 investments, the initial $2,000 plus five more. If the investments earn a return of 13% per year, how much will Mark have at the end of six years?
Business
1 answer:
adell [148]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The correct answer is:

$17,437.28

Explanation:

First of all, let us lay out the particulars that will aid us in our calculations:

Amount saved in year 1 = $2000

Number of years saved in total = 6 years

annual rate of savings increase = 10% increase on the amount for that year to the next year

Annual return on investment = 13%.

Next, let us calculate the 10% increase in savings from years 2 to 6.

Year 1 investment = $ 2000

Year 2 investment = Year 1 saving + 10% of year one saving

hence, investment 2 saving = 2000 + (10/100 × 2000) = 2000 + (0.1 × 2000)

Year 2 investment = 2000 +200 = $2,200.

Year 3 investment = year 2 saving + (0.1 × year 2 saving) = 2200 + (0.1 × 2200)

year 3 investment = 2200 + 220 = $2,420

Year 4 investment = 2420 + (0.1 × 2420) = 2420 + 242 = $2,662

Year 5 investment = 2662 + (0.1 × 2662) = 2662 + 266.2 = $2928.2

Year 6 investment = 2928.2 + (0.1 × 2928.2) = 2928.2 + 292.82 = $3,221.02

Next, let us create a table to show the total amount for each year.

Note, to determine the 13% annual investment return on each year:

13% = 13/100 = 0.13. So, we will multiply the investment for each year with 0.13 to get the annual investment. It is shown hence:

Year   Investment (I) ($)   Annual return (AR) ($)    Total amount (I + AR) ($)

1             2000                   260                                     2260

2            2200                   286                                     2486

3            2420                   314.6                                   2734.6

4            2662                   346.06                               3008.06

5            2928.2                380.67                               3308.87

6            3221.02               418.73                                3639.75

Total                                                                             17,437.28    

                     

Therefore, at the end of 6 years mark would have $17,437.28 (approx. $17,437)

You might be interested in
How would the market for smartphones be affected if the government charged an excise tax of $5.00 on each smartphone sold? quest
11111nata11111 [884]
<span>how would the market for smartphones be affected if the government charged an excise tax of $5.00 on each smartphone sold ? C) The supply of smartphones would decrease. Excise taxes are based on the quantity of an item and not on its value. For example, the federal government imposes an excise tax of 18.4 cents on every gallon of gas purchased, regardless of the price charged by the seller. States often add an additional excise tax on each gallon of fuel. so, government will charged 5.00$ excise tax on smartphone will affected supply of smartphones would decrease.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
When the indirect method is used, if accounts receivable increases during the accounting period, the change in accounts receivab
liberstina [14]
The answer is that "<span>the change in accounts receivable is subtracted from net income".
</span>

<span>When the indirect method is used, the starting point is the net income and it is transformed to cash flows from operational actions by adding back losses and subtracting gains so that these quantities are removed.</span>

4 0
3 years ago
What happens to the price of a three-year annual coupon paying bond with an 8% coupon when interest rates change from 8% to 6.85
ruslelena [56]

Face Value of bond = $1000

Annual Coupon Payment = $1000*8%

= $80

No of years to maturity(n) = 3 years

When the Market Interest rate was 8%, the Price of the bond will be the same as the Par value which is $1000 because when the Coupon rate and Market Interest rate are the same the Bond sells at par Value.

So, At an 8% Interest rate price is $1000

- Interest rate(YTM) changed to 8.86%

Calculating the Price of Bond:-

Price = \frac{CouponPayment}{(1+YTM)^{1}}+\frac{CouponPayment}{(1+YTM)^{2}}+...+\frac{CouponPayment}{(1+YTM)^{n}}+\frac{FaceValue}{(1+YTM)^{n}}

Price = \frac{80}{(1+0.0886)^{1}}+\frac{80}{(1+0.0886)^{2}}+\frac{80}{(1+0.0886)^{3}}+\frac{1000}{(1+0.0886)^{3}}

Price =$203.008 + $775.166

Price = $978.17

So, when the Interest rate changed to 8.86% the price falls to $978.17

Change in Price due to increase in Interest rate = $978.17 - $1000

= -$21.83

Hence, the price decreased by $21.83

Learn more about interest here

brainly.com/question/2294792

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
What is one action an employer can take to lower wage levels?
Serjik [45]
The answer is C. Replace workers with machine

It's common for a company to replace workers with maschines in order to do hard menial labour such as wrapping packages, cutting products, shaping the products, moving the raw material, etc. which could increase efficiency and lower wage levels at the same time
6 0
3 years ago
The Coase theorem states that A) the private sector will fail to produce the efficient amount of a public good because of the fr
Sonja [21]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

One of the problems in economics is the allocation of goods in the presence of externalities. When externalities are present allocation of goods in private market won't be efficient because private parties won't internalize them and would arrive to an inefficient outcome. For many years this was an argument in favor of government intervention.

However, Ronald Coase showed that assigning property rights of the externality to one of the private parties (no matter which one) would result in an efficient outcome. This is because  the parties with the property right would then internalize the cost. Then in the bargaining process private parties would reach an efficient outcome without the intervention of the government.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • ​after compiling a list of potential customers, a salesperson must
    15·1 answer
  • The aspect of business ethics that examines business institutions from a social rather than an individual perspective is referre
    12·1 answer
  • Chuck is concerned with what he considers to be an unfair situation at work. Although he put in 10 hours of overtime last week,
    8·1 answer
  • Crane Company uses the LCNRV method, on an individual item basis, in pricing its inventory items. The inventory at December 31,
    11·1 answer
  • Beranek Corp has $720,000 of assets, and it uses no debt--it is financed only with common equity. The new CFO wants to employ en
    6·1 answer
  • If beginning work in process is 3,900 units, ending work in process is 3,700 units, and the units accounted for equals 11,200 un
    12·1 answer
  • Jose has accepted a sales position at Business Solutions Corporation. Prior to this job, Jose worked in the electronics departme
    15·1 answer
  • What are value drivers? a set of factors (analogous to cost drivers) that are particularly effective in having a strong differen
    12·1 answer
  • On April 1, Quality Corporation, a U.S. company, expects to sell merchandise to a French customer in three months, denominating
    13·1 answer
  • Who is Adam Smith and what is his belief about prices? Do you agree or disagree? Why?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!