Answer: 6%
Explanation:
Based on the information given, when the flotation costs is ignored, the company's cost of preferred stock will be calculated thus:
Cost of preferred stock = Dividend on preferred stock / Price of preferred stock
Cost of preferred stock = 4.5/75 = 0.06 = 6%
Therefore, the cost of preferred stock is 6%.
Answer:
$14,76
Explanation:
Using a single plantwide factory overhead rate based on direct labor hours, the factory overhead rate for the year is $14,76.
Group of answer choices.
A. Is not warm enough to the applicants.
B. Is perceived as less credible because she is an HR specialist.
C. Does not give applicants enough information, leaving them with more questions than answers.
D. Comes off as being too professional for someone in the HR field.
E. Is not approaching the candidate with enough skepticism.
Answer:
B. Is perceived as less credible because she is an HR specialist.
Explanation:
Human resources (HR) can be defined as an art of managing, controlling and improving the number of people (employees or workers), functions, activities which are being used effectively and efficiently by an organization.
Hence, human resources managers are saddled with the responsibility of managing and improving the welfare and working conditions of the employees working in an organization.
In this scenario, Maria is well respected among her peers for her professional standards and understanding of the HR field. She noticed that when she recruits engineers for her company, they sometimes seem unresponsive to her. Thus, the most likely reason for this is because Maria is perceived as less credible because she is an HR specialist and as such is considered not to have a deep understanding of the field of engineering to recruit a qualified and experienced candidate.
Answer:
Select the answer that best describes the strategies in this game.
- Both companies dominant strategy is to add the train.
Does a Nash equilibrium exist in this game?
- A Nash equilibrium exists where both companies add a train. (Since I'm not sure how your matrix is set up I do not know the specific location).
Explanation:
we can prepare a matrix to determine the best strategy:
Swiss Rails
add train do not add train
$1,500 / $2,000 /
add train $4,000 $7,500
EuroRail
do not add train $4,000 / $3,000 /
$2,000 $3,000
Swiss Rails' dominant strategy is to add the train = $1,500 + $4,000 = $5,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
EuroRail's dominant strategy is to add the train = $4,000 + $7,500 = $11,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
A Nash equilibrium exists because both companies' dominant strategy is to add a train.
