Answer:
The estimate value of the subject property is $8,269,200
The other information that would be desirable in reaching a conclusion:
The closeness of the property to central business districts as the closer it is the higher the asking price.
The estimate was solely based on revenue, the applicable costs have been ignored.
The average taken might not be a good indication for the subject property because the property might have unique features
Explanation:
The formula for Gross Rent Multiplier is given Property Price / Gross Monthly Rental Income.
In determining the estimate value of the subject property ,we calculate the gross rent multiplier of the new property,then multiply it with the annual rental income.
In ascertaining the GRM of the new property we take the average GRM of the two similar properties in the same area.This is because the new property judging from number of units, lies in-between the other two properties.
GRM for Oaks
GRM=$9000000/($550*140)
GRM =116.88
GRM for Palms
GRM=$6,600,000/($650*90)
GRM =112.82
The average GRM=(116.88+112.82)/2
=114.85
Subject property price=114.85*(120*$600)
=$8,269,200
Answer:
Explanation:
Given that:
a)
1$ = Can $1.12
It takes a value of 1 U.S dollar to have 1.12 Canadian dollars. This signifies that the U.S dollar is worth more than Canadian dollars.
b)
Assuming that the absolute Purchasing Power Parity PPP holds,
Since 1$ = Can $1.12, the cost in the United States of an Elkhead beer, if the price in Canada is Can$2.85 can be determined to be:
= 
= $2.545
c)
Yes, the U.S. dollar is selling at a premium relative to the Canadian dollar.
This is because we are being told that the spot exchange rate for the Canadian dollar is Can $1.12 & in six (6) months time the forward rate will be Can $1.14.
d)
The U.S dollar is expected to appreciate in value because it is trading at a premium in the forward market.
e)
Canada has higher interest rates. This determined by using the formula:
= 
where; n= numbers of years = 6 month/12 month = 0.5 year
Then;
= 0.0356
= 3.56%
Answer: E.When there are so many industry rivals that the impact of any one company's actions is spread thinly across all industry members
Explanation:
The more the number of players in an industry the more it gets congested and especially for the competing sellers. The decision for increasing or reducing price is met by follower firms to do the same thing. It gets less competitive because you know all the players in the industry would be following the same practices and doing the same thing.
Because it involves the growing in third dependency among. The Konomi‘s of the world; mold to national nature of sourcing, manufacturing, trading and investment activities increasing frequency of cross-border.
Answer:
Net operating income is $300
Explanation:
We know that,
The net operating income = Sales - variable cost - fixed expenses
And, the contribution margin = Sales - variable cost
So, contribution margin - fixed expenses = Net operating income
Since we have to compute the net operating income for 3,500 units So, first we have to compute the contribution margin per unit which is shown below:
= Contribution margin ÷ number of units
= $48,000 ÷ 4,000 units
= $12
Now for 3,500 units, the contribution margin would be
= 3,500 units × $12
= $42,000
So, the net operating income would be
= $42,000 - $41,700
= $300
The fixed expenses would not be changes. It remains constant
