Answer:The increase in the supply of crops had decreased price by a greater percentage than the percentage increase in the quantity of sales.
Explanation:
An increase in supply leads to a fall in price due to large volume of goods supply compare to non increasing demand and when the rate of fall is greater than sales this will not lead to a rise in revenue despite the increase in effective supply to the market.
Answer:
A) 19.91%
Explanation:
Net present value of cash flow at 19.91% can be calculated as follows
- 100000 + 30000/1.1991 + 30000/ (1.1991)² + 30000/(1.1991)³ + 30000/ (1.1991)⁴ +30000/(1.1991)⁵ + 30000/ (1.1991)⁶
= -100000 + 25018 +20864 +17400 +14511 +12101 +10092
= 0 ( approx )
So the IRR for the project is 19.91 % .
Answer:
D : $88,800
Explanation:
<u>Cost of goods manufactured :</u>
Direct Material used in production $
21,300
Indirect Material used in production $ 3,700
Direct Labour $
34,100
Direct Labour $ 5,900
Manufacturing overhead <u> $ 16,600 </u>
Total Manufacturing cost $ 75100
Add:Beginning Work in process inventory $7,200
Less: Ending Work in process inventory <u>$ 0 </u>
Cost of Goods Manufactured <u>$88,800</u>
The decision tree is the element of a crisis management plan.
<h3>What is the decision tree?</h3>
The component of a crisis management strategy called the Decision Tree outlines the steps that should be taken once a problem or crisis has been discovered.
The Decision Tree also specifies which team members should be involved, when publishing activities should be paused, and who will determine when a crisis is finished and regular social media operations can resume.
These trees are very useful for assessing numerical data and coming to a numerically-based judgment.
Learn more about the decision tree here:
brainly.com/question/12975851
#SPJ4
Answer:
He could afford to spend $133,411 for the device now.
Explanation:
The maximum the surgeon could afford for the device is equal to the sum of present value of the lawsuit costs that he can avoid in year 2 and year 5 which is:
+ Year 2: 600,000 * %out-of-pocket cost for the law suit = 600,000 * 10% = $60,000;
+ Year 5: 1,350,000 * %out-of-pocket cost for the law suit = 1,350,000 * 10% = $135,000.
=> The amount he can afford for the device = 60,000 / 1.1^2 + 135,000 / 1.1^5 = $133,411.
So, the answer is $133,411.
