1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pychu [463]
3 years ago
7

_______ is a Group of people who decide a case after hearing the evidence

Law
2 answers:
azamat3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A jury is a Group of people who decide a case after hearing the evidence

Valentin [98]3 years ago
4 0
A jury is a group of people who decide a case after hearing the evidence
You might be interested in
Which act restricted trade practices that sought to eliminate competition or encourage monopoly?
san4es73 [151]

Answer:

The (B) Sherman Antitrust Act restricted trade practices that sought to eliminate competition or encourage monopoly.

  • This act made this illegal and you could be arrested.
  • The main purpose of this act was to conserve competition is business.

I hope this helped at all.

6 0
2 years ago
What are the disadvantages with delegated legislation
kherson [118]

Answer:

There is little publicity compared with Acts of Parliament which may mean people are unaware a ruling exists. Control by Parliament isn't always effective. Few affirmative resolutions exist and MP's are too busy to look over them, and controls are often not used anyway. There is a lack of scrutiny.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who supports judicial restraint?
balu736 [363]

Judicial restraint is the political theory that says courts shouldn't, unless absolutely required, issue rulings that broaden or alter the character of existing laws.

<h3>Justiciable constraint is exercised by whom?</h3>

A jurist (judge or justice) who upholds a philosophy of restraint can be described as one who considers democracy to have intrinsic, rather than just instrumental, value, that the judiciary is indeed the least powerful of the three branches of government, and who values stability and predictability in the lawmaking process.

<h3>Why do advocates of judicial restraint assert that judges are impervious to public sentiment?</h3>

They are freed from the strain of the outer world of public opinion since they do not have to worry about being reelected. In the end, the majority may not always be correct. The fact that the Founders established appointed judges and elected legislators is not by coincidence.

Learn more about Judicial restraint: brainly.com/question/29545866

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
Mikhail S. Tswett (1872-1919) realized that ________ was an efficient method for separating compounds.
Elza [17]

Answer:

Chromatography

Explanation:

Mikhail Semyonovich Tswett was a Russian-Italian botanist born on the 14th of May, 1872 in Asti, Italy and died on the 26th of June, 1919 in Voronezh, Russia. He is famously known for his invention of the separation technique called chromatography.

Chromatography was developed in 1903 by the Russian-Italian botanist Mikhail Semyonovich Tswett using a column of calcium carbonate to colourfully separate plant pigments extracted through the use of ether and alcohol, this separation technique is generally referred to as adsorption chromatography.

Hence, Mikhail S. Tswett (1872-1919) realized that chromatography was an efficient method for separating compounds without prior knowledge of the quantities and nature of the chemicals present in a mixture.

Mixture can be defined as a combination of two or more substances which are present in varied proportion and can be visibly seen by with our naked eyes.

In Science, there are two (2) main types of mixture and these are;

I. A homogeneous mixture: it can be defined as any liquid, solid or gaseous mixture which has an identical or uniform composition and properties throughout any given sample of the mixture. In Chemistry, all solutions are considered to be a homogeneous mixture. For example, aqueous hydrogen chloride is a homogeneous mixture of water and hydrogen chloride.

This ultimately implies that, in a homogeneous mixture, parts are uniformly (evenly) distributed.

II. A heterogenous mixture: it can be defined as any mixture which has a different or non-uniform composition and properties throughout any given sample of the mixture. This ultimately implies that, the constituents of a heterogenous mixture always remain separate in the sample and as such comprises of two or more phases.

For example, a mixture of sand and coffee is simply a heterogenous mixture and can easily be separated into their various components.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I used to be in a speech and debate class if anyone wants to help me practice debating I am here.
kherson [118]

This probably is not quite what you're looking for, but I have listed debating techniques:

Judges generally score the speakers looking at this criteria:

Content / Matter - What the debaters say, their arguments and evidence, the relevance of their arguments.

Style / Manner - How the debaters speak, including the language and tone used.

Strategy / Method - The structure of the speech, the clarity and responding to other's arguments.

SKILLS:

Your points must be relevant to the topic.

Provide evidence whenever you can and not your personal opinion.

You must put aside your personal views and remain objective when you debate so your argument remains logical. You can be passionate about a topic but interest can turn into aggression and passion can turn into upset.

Consider the audience's attention span - make it interesting, for example, don't just present lots of complicated statistics.

Use rhetoric to persuade - consider using the three pillars of rhetoric:

Ethos - the ethical appeal

Pathos - the emotional appeal

Logos - the logical appeal

Use notes but keep them brief and well organized. Use a different piece of paper for rebuttals.

Similar to looking at conclusions to create rebuttals, think comparatively by asking yourself "How does my plan compare to what's happening now/what would happen in the world if the other team won?" You can win the debate if you can make comparative claims about why your arguments matter more than the other team.

Only tell jokes if you're naturally good at it otherwise this can backfire.

Flexibility is important because you might get allocated the side of the argument you don't agree with. You'll have to work hard to overcome your views. Also use this insight to think of the potential arguments you might make and then plan for counter arguments.

Voice

Speak clearly and concisely.

You must talk fast enough to have the time to deliver your speech but slow enough so you can be understood.

Project your voice to the back of the room.

Incorporate pauses.

Emphasize important words and vary your tone appropriately.

Confidence

Have a relaxed pose and posture.

Avoid filler words.

Know your material.

Emphasize using gestures.

Maintain eye contact with the audience.

Language

Keep your language simple to avoid confusion.

Refer to the opposite side as: "My opponent".

When making a rebuttal say: "My opponent said..., however..."

Don't exaggerate - avoid the words "never" or "always" etc.

Avoid saying that a speaker "is wrong", instead say that "your idea is mistaken".

What to avoid

Falsifying, making up or altering evidence.

Attacking a speaker rather than an idea.

Acting aggressively or offensively towards debaters, judges, audience etc.

Interrupting other debaters as this can suggest that your argument isn't very strong.

Disagreeing with facts or obvious truths.

There are common flaws you can look for to form a rebuttal:

1. False dichotomy

2. Assertion

3. Morally flawed

4. Correlation rather than causation

5. Failure to deliver promises

6. Straw man

7. Contradiction

8. Compare the conclusion to reality

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How can pavement markings indicate that you are driving in the right<br> direction?
    5·1 answer
  • What is the history of the fourth amendment
    14·1 answer
  • One person’s consumption of a product reducing the amount available for other people is a characteristic of a __________ good.
    6·1 answer
  • 2.4 Which department/organization would you approach if your human rights have been
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following individual is NOT considered a U.S. citizen?
    12·1 answer
  • Con la evolución del derecho romano y con la expedición del cerebro edicto de Antonio caracalla, se extinguió la clasificación d
    9·1 answer
  • How does Medicare for All promote equality in our health care system? Please provide evidence to support how it does.
    11·1 answer
  • 19. Which of these vehicles must stop before crossing railroad tracks?
    8·1 answer
  • A. With both vehicles approaching a stop sign, which vehicle has the right of way at this intersection?
    15·1 answer
  • What are your thoughts on this interview? Does Richard Clarke have a point when discussing breaking the Department of Homeland S
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!