1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Illusion [34]
3 years ago
9

What do you think of my opinion of gadgets used by the police? Explain your answer!

Law
2 answers:
Anna11 [10]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

good,because everything is explained and correct

Explanation:

HOW DID U GET TO WRITE ALL OF THAT?

shutvik [7]3 years ago
4 0
I really like this! I think you did an excellent job on describing your thoughts and opinions.

I really do agree that police pursuits can be extremely dangerous to civilians, and a way to solve this is by the use of gadgets.

I do think there are a few run on sentences and a very slight grammar errors.

For example, in the sentence “currently, the police…, there could be a comma added before and after the words “in fact”.

But this is great!

You might be interested in
Two key questions should be asked when analyzing the problem dimension. Which of the following are the correct questions?
sineoko [7]

Answer:

For this problem we just refer to the descriptions that you placed under the prompt. According to Malcolm's bandmate, it would be easier to solve the trinomial by subtracting 350 from both sides and then factoring the equation. Malcolm, on the other hand, thinks that we should manipulate the equation in order to make it a perfect square trinomial.

2. This trinomial would be easily solved by using Malcolm's idea. As Malcolm pointed out, you just need to apply a formula to manipulate the equation then you can find the roots in no time. Finding the factors of 350 just to solve the trinomial would be the hard way to go since you would be considering a lot of them.

3. For this item, we are just tasked to follow what Malcolm's bandmate started doing. So, we would just need to think of two numbers that would result to -350 when multiplied. To start off, let's think of something we can divide 350 by, let's say 70. Now, if we divide -350 by 70 the result would be -5 therefore that would be our two numbers (p and q). p + q would therefore just be 65.

Explanation:

add up and keep doing it

4 0
3 years ago
Giving away another brainliest!!
Vadim26 [7]

Answer:

Ooooo thank you for the points :)

Have a good day

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
vì sao lại phải quy định những nơi sử dụng lao động không được đình công tại điều 209 bộ luật lao động năm 2019
Art [367]
OkkCHDHJFFJFFIGIGIGIIGGIIY
5 0
2 years ago
Explain the role of social media in the:
Aleks [24]
The role of social media is to express there feeling and have people share good story’s social media is a bad place to go for for news. As it can make problems start up.
8 0
3 years ago
Should there be limits on campaign contributions people and businesses can make to political campaigns. Why or Why not?
Dovator [93]

Answer:

yes because the people should decide not the super wealthy

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many Special Agent Entry Programs does the FBI have for applicants? 6 3 5 4
    5·1 answer
  • Off the four purposes of the U.S criminal justice system, is there one that seems nobler than the others Explain?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a factor that causes a change in supply?
    14·1 answer
  • Jenna works for the US criminal justice system. Her duties include counseling offenders who have been released early from their
    12·2 answers
  • Why do appeals courts have oral arguments if they already have briefs describing the issues in the appeal? (Select all that appl
    9·1 answer
  • Civic virtue is also known as what?
    15·1 answer
  • What is a skill in law enforcement that helps an officer describe things?
    12·1 answer
  • What are the 5 goals that you want to accomplish?
    10·2 answers
  • Are federal agencies required to have rcr policies
    10·1 answer
  • Deneen sweeting was a defendant in the third circuit in 2000. what aspect of criminal law is his case about
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!