Answer: In the first paragraph, the narraraor seeks to establish his credibility, as if he expects the reader to believe that his especially acute sense of hearing makes him more believable than an ordinary observer. The narrarator purports that his calm, detailed account will be accepted as truthful, despite some irrational decisions and actions. The narrarator's attention to detail clues the reader to "expect the unexpected" in terms of details the narrator's heightened senses reveal.
In the third paragraph, the narrator reveals that he has, in fact, killed the old man. We are hearing the account of a murderer rationalizing his actions, as if this is what anyone with his keen perception and ability to carry out this elelaborate scheme would have done. The reader realizes that this narrator is crazy, but we are still listening, but we can intrpret his intentions as absolutely irrational. Speaking corageously to the man by day, sneaking stealthily into his bedroom by night.
The fourth paragraph confirms the reader's suspicions that the narator is beyond belief: feeling the extent of his own powers. And even when he thinks the old man may have heard him, he persists in his incredibly slow, deliberate intention to intrude into the man's bedroom-- hoping to see what he has defined as Evil Eye-- as if the narrator has a duty to eliminate something that vexes only him. Our impression must be that this narrator can't escape the consequences of his actions.
Answer:
The option which best states the author's overall purpose in this text is:
D. To inform the reader of a theory that attempts to explain why generations act the way they do.
Explanation:
I looked this question up and found out it concerns the text "What Past Generations Can Teach Us About Our Future," by former Newsweek correspondent Mike Kubic (born in 1927).
According to the article, Strauss & Howe developed a theory that explains and, in a way, even predicts how each generation will act. There are four "turnings" or stages which generations go through. According to Strauss & Howe's observations, these stages always happen in the same order: high, awakening, unraveling, and crisis. The generation belonging to each turning will always present certain traits and behaviors concerning their sense of community, individualism, economic prosperity, respect for institutions, etc.
<u>According to Kubic, this theory has been both praised and criticized, even though, so far, it has been able to successfully make predictions about the American society. However, it is important to note that Kubic does not praise or criticize it himself. All he does is describe and explain it. His purpose is to inform readers about the existence of the theory.</u>
Balthasar and Gold Keynote templates are best for use in a professional environment. However, care must be taken when choosing slide templates, as the user may focus more on the details of the template than on the presentation.
<h3>What are the strong features of the Balthasar template?</h3>
- It has a vast amount of editable graphics.
- It has elegant and formal colors.
- It has a clean and objective look.
- It has a wide variety of visual features.
<h3>What are the strong features of the Gold Keynote template?</h3>
- It has a highly standardized interface.
- It presents great freedom of customization of resources.
- It presents complementary and cohesive colors.
- It has a wide range of visuals.
- It presents a formal and sober look.
Both templates are very effective for a professional environment that requires sobriety and objective information. In this context, it is important that the user coherently uses the templates, not only focusing on the details and the use of visual resources but paying attention to the quality and objectivity of the presentation, using the template as a resource and not as the center of information.
Learn more about PowerPoint presentations:
brainly.com/question/23714390
#SPJ1
Answer: express outrage when they feel that someone has transgressed against their sense of right and wrong,
Explanation:
In the realm of morality and politics, people usually “express outrage when they feel that someone has transgressed against their sense of right and wrong,” Brady explains. And finally, the statement has to evoke certain consequences: “Someone wants to hold someone else accountable, or punish them, or call them out.