The answer is<u> "Participant observation".</u>
It can be be said that to a specific degree Malinowski is supported in his case that participant observation enables anthropologists to see the 'local's perspective.' Significantly, Malinowski was one of the first to be considered important for the technique for participant observation in anthropological hands on work. It was his conviction that with a specific end goal to feel the local lifestyle, one should completely drench themselves in the way of life to escape previously established inclinations, while similarly not adopting a disengaged strategy that would result in 'dead material.
Goal setting is the first step in human resource planning.
Option:B
Explanation:
With the help of proper educational facilities, medical facilities mankind can be turned into proper human resource. The most important thing in human resource planning is to optimum utilization of organization's asset. Quality labor is the biggest asset of an organization. The following points should keep in mind during human resource planning
- Setting of proper objectives
- Formatting the guidelines
- Balance in between the demand and supply.
- Supervising, Observing and collection of feedback.
Answer:
stop this comparison but hinduism ia answer
Answer:
Elections affect the Supreme Court like this:
When a president is elected in the US, they are most likely to be of one political party or another. The president also appoints a Supreme Court Justice. If a president is considering appointing a judge, they will probably appoint someone who shares their views, so as to sway matters that get taken to the Supreme Court in their favor.
Explanation:
Example, because I'm not sure I explained correctly: If a president is more left-leaning, they can (and probably will) appoint a left-leaning judge, so that they will judge matters as they or their political party would judge them. Appointing a judge with whom you disagree with isn't a strategic idea, because the president's ideals may be very different from a right-leaning judge. t-leaning, they can (and probably will) appoint a left-leaning judge, so that they will judge matters as they or their political party would judge them. Appointing a judge with whom you disagree isn't a strategic idea, because the president's ideals may be very different from a right-leaning judge.
