Here is a histogram displaying the top 30 lifetime batting averages in baseball history. This distribution of data shows lots of
lifetime averages in the middle classes, but tails off sharply at both the upper and lower ends. What best explains the fact that there are very few averages in the lowest class? . A. Histograms always have taller bars in the middle.. . B. The histogram is symmetrical.. . C. There may be other hitters in the 320s, but they didn't make the top 30.. . D. Batting averages lie on a bell-shaped curve. . . E. Very few batters are skillful enough... read further
The correct answer to this question is letter "<span> C. There may be other hitters in the 320s, but they didn't make the top 30." </span>his distribution of data shows lots of lifetime averages in the middle classes, but tails off sharply at both the upper and lower ends. The statement that best explains the fact that there are very few averages in the lowest class is that t<span>here may be other hitters in the 320s, but they didn't make the top 30.</span>
