Answer: Talk about the difference
For Gottman the problem is not in conflicts, as they are common and inevitable, it is in the mechanisms that are activated when problems arise.
As a result, couples who break up often get stuck in negative emotions that lead to a self-destructive cycle; consistent in employing communication mechanisms that hurt and are ineffective in resolving or accepting the situation.
The answer is a desirable outcome. In an approach-approach, the individual is faced with the necessity of making a choice between two (or more) desirable goals. Since both goals are desirable, this is the least worrying situation. "Shall I fly or take a boat to Europe?" might be easily determined if both means of travel are seen as pleasurable. Such situations produce a state of unstable equilibrium. As soon as one goal is approached, its desirability increases and completely dominates, thereby making the choice easy. The choice becomes easier the closer one moves toward either goal. Another example is when a person pick between two attractive and practicable careers, may lead to some indecisiveness but rarely to great distress. A person chooses the most convenient goal that results to a desirable outcome.
Pluralistic ignorance is most closely related to<u> Uncertainty condition</u> for social proof.
<h3>What is Pluralistic Ignorance?</h3>
Pluralistic ignorance is a significant cognitive fallacy that all individuals, some more than others, experience. It is the mistaken belief that one's thoughts or values are different than the perceived thoughts of the majority.
Pluralistic ignorance is connected to social norms and other aspects of public behavior. It is evidenced by situations in which individuals have one or more beliefs, values, or priorities that they believe differ from those of the rest of the members of the group.
When everyone in the group is uncertain and looking around for clues to appropriate behavior, the result can sometimes lead to "pluralistic ignorance."
Pluralistic ignorance occurs when individuals infer that the identical actions of the self and others reflect different internal stress.
<u>Three steps to pluralistic ignorance:</u>
- People self-censor. They do not always express their true thoughts and feelings for fear of embarrassment/rejection
- People incorrectly conclude others are expressing their true feelings and thoughts, even though they are censoring
- People conclude their own thoughts/feelings are not shared by others
Learn more about Pluralistic Ignorance on:
brainly.com/question/25735916
#SPJ4
The first one is correct “ She ate the sweet just apple with a vengeance”
His specific abilities like being good runner
