Answer:
Learning
Explanation:
Learning is defined by many psychologists but the famous definition is that learning is the permanent change in the behavior by experience in life. The learning behavior focused on how people behave and react in the environment.
John B. Watson was the fist behaviorist who focused on learning due to experience. He suggests that all the behavior that occurs is the result of learning. It also suggests that the study on memory, cognition, and thought is too subjective that is very difficult to define. They have conducted a scientific study on behaviorism. It flourished to half of the decades and proposed many principles and aspects of learning.
Research on gender differences would lead one to anticipate that Alex is "less" likely to detect faint odors and "less" likely to smile frequently than his sister Shayna.
Men and females enormously vary in their perceptual assessment of odors, with ladies outflanking men on numerous sorts of smell tests. Women’s unrivaled olfactory capacity is a fundamental characteristic that has been acquired and afterward kept up all through evolution, a thought communicated by Romanian dramatist Eugene Ionesco when he said "a nose that can see is worth two that sniff."
There are at least three reasons why historians might conclude that Christianity appealed more to many Romans than the old Roman religion did. We must remember that these are ideas that historians propose and not necessarily those that religious people would accept. Actual Romans might have said they preferred Christianity because God spoke to their hearts and told them it was true. Historians have to be more cynical and look for worldly causes for religious belief.
One reason that Romans might have liked Christianity is because its god cared about people. Roman religion was based on transactions. If people performed certain actions, the gods would perform other actions in return. It was like buying something on Amazon. By contrast, in Christianity, God loves all people regardless of what they do or believe. God hopes that people will do the right thing and will punish them if they do wrong, but he loves them as individuals even when they do bad things. Historians say that Romans might have liked this idea because it fed their emotional need to feel that they were valuable and worth caring about.
A second factor in Christianity’s popularity might have been its moral code. Roman religion really did not say much if anything about how people should act in their daily lives. The gods did not care how people acted towards one another. The Christian god, on the other hand, handed down a strict set of rules about how people were to behave. This might have made people like Christianity because it made them feel that they had instructions about how to live their lives.
Finally, historians emphasize Christianity’s inclusive nature. The Roman world was very unequal. There were a few elites, a group of people who were well-off, and many, many poor people and slaves. The Roman religion did not give any of the people of the lower classes a sense that they were valuable. This is where Christianity was so different. It taught that all people are equal in the eyes of God. Historians believe that this would have made many people like the idea of Christianity because it gave them hope that god cared about them regardless of their status and that they, the “meek” would one day inherit the earth.
Historians suggest all of these as reasons why people in Roman times might have been attracted to Christianity.
