Answer:
2400
Explanation:
The HHI is calculated by squaring the market share of each firm in the industry.
30² + 25² + 25² + 15² + 5² = 2400
"Without engaging in international trade, Freedonia and Lamponia would have been able to consume at the after-trade consumption bundles" is FALSE.
<u>Option:</u> B
<u>Explanation:</u>
Specialization refers to countries' propensity to focus in certain items they exchange for other commodities, rather than to manufacture all the consumer goods on their own. As the PPF production possibilities frontier displays that production is impractical, Freedonia and Lamponia had to engage in international trade.
Both countries are able to consume the goods they produce.When a country is skilled in manufacturing a good, it can manufacture this good at a lower cost of opportunity than its trading nation. For this comparative advantage, both countries benefit from competing and trading with one another.
Answer:
Value of company = $982.16
Explanation:
The free cash flow is the cash generated by a company that is not retained and reinvested. It is the cash flow available to all providers of capital . It is available to pay dividend or finance other project
The value of the company would be the present value of its free cash flow discounted at the weighted average cost of capital.
Value of company )year 4= 85/(0.12-0.065) = 1,545.45
Value of company (in year 0) = 1,545.45× 1.12^(-4)= 982.16
Value of company = $982.16 millions
Answer:
The correct answer is A. In Ricci v. DeStefano, the Supreme Court ruled that an employer may not simply disregard a test based on unwanted results unless the test is shown to be biased or deficient.
Explanation:
Ricci v. DeStefano is a Supreme Court ruling of 2009, after a lawsuit by nineteen firefighters who claimed to have been discriminated against in terms of career development. They denounced that they had been discriminated after having passed the admission tests and still had not been promoted, since no African-American candidate had passed the tests. They also denounced that they had not been promoted because the Fire Department did not want to promote a group of new recruits without including within it any member of racial minorities.
Finally, the Supreme Court established that said procedure violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, since in the case equal access to employment was not guaranteed (in this case, favoring minorities over white firefighters), for set different demands for purely racial reasons.
