To keep every other branch in check if we had only one then they could go corrupt. (separation of power)
Answer: d. $240,400
Explanation:
To calculate the Cost of Goods sold for the year we simply add the Opening Balance of Finished goods to the Cost of Goods for the year and then subtract the Finished goods balance at year end (ending).
That would be,
= 233,000 + 31,600 - 24,200
= $240,400
$240,400 is the Cost of Goods sold for the year so Option D is correct.
Answer:
Rice is so cheap and truffles are so expansive because D. People eat so much rice that an additional serving of rice has little marginal value, but the marginal value of another serving of truffles is very high.
Explanation:
When it comes to tasty or nutritious foods, there should not be any reason to be more expensive than others food stuffs. However, they often cost a little more. Regarding rice and its easy way of cooking, it is not a strong argument to talk about the price. So the right answer D, due to the fact that is true that eating a higher rate of rice won't have such a great marginal value as it will with truffles. It has to do a lot with higher demand of rice.
Answer:
$3,418,800
Explanation:
Contribution margin per hour:
Plush: 4 units per hour x $231 = $924
Supreme: 2 units per hour x $317 = $634
Since contribution margin per hour from Plush is higher than Supreme, we select Plush as the most profitable sales. Hence,
Total contribution = 3,700 hours available x $924 = $3,418,800
Hope this helps!
Answer:
E) participative.
<u>The multiple-choice options for this question are: </u>
A) laissez-faire.
B) hands-off.
C) existential.
D) authoritarian.
E) participative.
Explanation:
In the participative leadership style, the manager invites employees' input when making all or most company decisions. The employees are adequate information regarding company issues. Each of the staff members is accorded an opportunity to make their contribution to the subject matter. If the team cannot reach a consensus, a majority vote determines the direction the company will take.
Participative leadership is criticized for slow f decision-making. Its main advantage is that decisions are easily acceptable by all, making implementation seamless.
