The pattern of development that we can see started from the evolving in the Ganges river would be
- The development of the monarchs that brought about Hinduism
- The development of the caste system as the structure of the Indian society.
<h3>What is meant by the pattern of development in India?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the way that the Indian societies has been built overtime. It is used to tells us the way that the society was built and how it has affected the present society that we have today.
The caste system is the system of hierarchy that exists in India that has placed the society into societal strata with some classes being at the top while others are menat to serve the ones at the top hence they are at the bottom.
Hence we can say that The pattern of development that we can see started from the evolving in the Ganges river would be
- The development of the monarchs that brought about Hinduism
- The development of the caste system as the structure of the Indian society.
Read more on Indian civilization here:
brainly.com/question/14762739
#SPJ1
Famine, disease and conflict with local Native American tribes in the first two years brought Jamestown to the brink of failure before the arrival of a new group of settlers and supplies in 1610.
Tobacco became Virginia’s first profitable export, and a period of peace followed the marriage of colonist John Rolfe to Pocahontas, the daughter of an Algonquian chief.
During the 1620s, Jamestown expanded from the area around the original James Fort into a New Town built to the east; it remained the capital of the Virginia colony until 1699.
<span>The </span>Twenty-fourth Amendment<span> (</span>Amendment<span> XXIV) of the United States Constitution prohibits both Congress and the states from conditioning the right to vote in federal elections on payment of a poll tax or other types of tax. The </span>amendment<span> was proposed by Congress to the states on August 27, 1962, and was ratified by the ...
</span>
<span> it ensured that careers would be open on the basis of merit and not privileges of birth.
It did not guarantee women equal rights but confirmed the existing
supremacy of men over women; women had fewer rights than children.
It didn't either enshrine individual rights or the security of the state- there was a balance. </span>
